Action Items Execute

Last 30 days

Uptime

100%

Response time

785 ms typical, 1.2 s slowest 5%

Last check

1 h ago

Next check

any minute now

How to call it

# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X POST "https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/action_items/execute" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Extract only evidenced actions, owners, due dates, and unresolved assignments from supplied notes. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}'

import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Faction_items%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/action_items/execute", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Extract only evidenced actions, owners, due dates, and unresolved assignments from supplied notes. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}),
});
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "audience": "Business operations manager",
  "brief": "Extract only evidenced actions, owners, due dates, and unresolved assignments from supplied notes. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
  "source_text": "Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."
}

Example output

{
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Extracted Actions, Owners, Due Dates, and Unresolved Assignments\n\n| Action                          | Owner      | Due Date | Status/Notes                            |\n|--------------------------------|------------|----------|---------------------------------------|\n| Conduct process assessment      | Vendor A   | Unknown  | Proposed at $500; decision pending    |\n| Conduct process assessment + staff workshop | Vendor B | Unknown  | Proposed at $800; decision pending    |\n| Evaluate proposals",
  "assumptions": [
    "The Business Operations Manager is responsible for evaluating vendor proposals and making decisions.",
    "Vendor A and Vendor B are the only vendors under consideration based on the supplied notes."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    "Specific due dates for vendor assessments or workshops.",
    "Owner assignments for scheduling and data collection tasks."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "external_research_performed": false,
    "generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:42:20.051Z",
    "source": "buyer_supplied"
  },
  "request_id": "example_action_items",
  "requires_human_review": true,
  "summary": "The project involves improving scheduling over six weeks for Example Door Company. Two vendor proposals exist but no vendor has been selected. Evaluation criteria are defined but no assessments or wor",
  "task": "action_items"
}

Security scan

• No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks