Agent Analyse
by api.zendiq.ai in Onchain & crypto
Solana swap triage for AI agents. Returns a Safe / Protect / Refuse verdict for a proposed swap: token risk screening, sandwich-attack exposure, and the priority fee and Jito tip to use. Call it before signing a swap. Advisory only: builds no transaction and never handles keys. Pay in USDC; network fees are sponsored. Full contract: GET /v1/agent. Terms: https://zendiq.ai/agents/terms/
https://api.zendiq.ai/v1/agent/analyse- Price
- $0.01
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 393 ms
- 736 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 10 min ago, next in 20 min
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
POST https://api.zendiq.ai/v1/agent/analyse
Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Solana, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://api.zendiq.ai/v1/agent/analyse
content-type: application/json
{
"amount": "100000000",
"inputMint": "So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112",
"outputMint": "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",
"slippageBps": 50
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
amount | string | Yes | Amount sold, as an integer string in the input mint's atomic units. |
inputMint | string | Yes | Base58 mint of the token being sold. |
outputMint | string | Yes | Base58 mint of the token being bought. Must differ from inputMint. |
slippageBps | integer | No | Optional. Omit to let the router decide. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"analysisId": "an_3q9cX1lJ0rVb2Tq8",
"confidence": "medium",
"reasons": [
"Sandwich exposure scored HIGH (67/100) for this route and size."
],
"recommendedExecution": {
"jitoTipLamports": 55996,
"path": "jito_bundle",
"priorityFeeLamports": 300000
},
"sandwichExposure": {
"level": "HIGH",
"score": 67
},
"tokenRisk": {
"level": "LOW",
"mint": "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",
"score": 0,
"symbol": "USDC"
},
"verdict": "Protect"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://api.zendiq.ai/v1/agent/analyse' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"amount":"100000000","inputMint":"So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112","outputMint":"EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v","slippageBps":50}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://api.zendiq.ai/v1/agent/analyse' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"amount":"100000000","inputMint":"So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112","outputMint":"EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v","slippageBps":50}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/svm @solana/kit @scure/base
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactSvmScheme } from "@x402/svm/exact/client";
import { createKeyPairSignerFromBytes } from "@solana/kit";
import { base58 } from "@scure/base";
// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactSvmScheme(client, { signer: await createKeyPairSignerFromBytes(base58.decode(process.env.SVM_PRIVATE_KEY)) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.zendiq.ai%2Fv1%2Fagent%2Fanalyse&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://api.zendiq.ai/v1/agent/analyse", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"amount": "100000000",
"inputMint": "So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112",
"outputMint": "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",
"slippageBps": 50
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,svm]"
import os
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.svm import KeypairSigner
from x402.mechanisms.svm.exact.register import register_exact_svm_client
# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_svm_client(client, KeypairSigner.from_base58(os.environ["SVM_PRIVATE_KEY"]))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://api.zendiq.ai/v1/agent/analyse",
json={
"amount": "100000000",
"inputMint": "So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112",
"outputMint": "EPjFWdd5AufqSSqeM2qN1xzybapC8G4wEGGkZwyTDt1v",
"slippageBps": 50,
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 min ago | Passed | 402 | 726 ms | $0.01 |
| 5 h ago | Passed | 402 | 370 ms | $0.01 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 439 ms | $0.01 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 328 ms | $0.01 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 277 ms | $0.01 |
Show 10 older checks
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 312 ms | $0.01 |
| 27 h ago | Passed | 402 | 736 ms | $0.01 |
| 31 h ago | Passed | 402 | 496 ms | $0.01 |
| 35 h ago | Passed | 402 | 393 ms | $0.01 |
| 39 h ago | Passed | 402 | 372 ms | $0.01 |
| 44 h ago | Passed | 402 | 345 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 287 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 929 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 486 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 424 ms | $0.01 |