Agents Allowed
by KYA Brasil in Markets & finance
Signed verdict: is this action (action, amount, currency, counterparty, payment instrument) inside the agent's mandate and is the credential active? Evaluates the reserved mandate fields; lists the fields it did not evaluate.
https://kya-br-agents.marcelfons.workers.dev/v1/agents/:id/allowed- Price
- $0.01
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 1.1 s
- 1.6 s slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 2 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://kya-br-agents.marcelfons.workers.dev/v1/agents/:id/allowed
Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://kya-br-agents.marcelfons.workers.dev/v1/agents/:id/allowed?action=pay&amount=80&counterparty=33000167000101¤cy=USDCParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
action | string | No | |
amount | string | No | |
counterparty | string | No | CNPJ, domain or wallet address |
currency | string | No | |
payment_network | string | No | visa, mastercard, elo, pix, ... |
payment_ref_sha256 | string | No | SHA-256 hex of the payment token reference or PAR (never a card number) |
spent_today | string | No |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"allowed": true,
"attestation": {
"key_id": "…",
"signature": "…"
},
"checks": [
{
"field": "actions",
"ok": true
}
],
"credential_id": "6d0b…",
"not_evaluated": [],
"reason": "inside the mandate",
"status": "active"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://kya-br-agents.marcelfons.workers.dev/v1/agents/:id/allowed?action=pay&amount=80&counterparty=33000167000101¤cy=USDC'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://kya-br-agents.marcelfons.workers.dev/v1/agents/:id/allowed?action=pay&amount=80&counterparty=33000167000101¤cy=USDC' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fkya-br-agents.marcelfons.workers.dev%2Fv1%2Fagents%2F%3Aid%2Fallowed
const res = await pay("https://kya-br-agents.marcelfons.workers.dev/v1/agents/:id/allowed?action=pay&amount=80&counterparty=33000167000101¤cy=USDC");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://kya-br-agents.marcelfons.workers.dev/v1/agents/:id/allowed?action=pay&amount=80&counterparty=33000167000101¤cy=USDC")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.3 s | $0.01 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 938 ms | $0.01 |
| 12 h ago | Passed | 402 | 864 ms | $0.01 |
| 16 h ago | Passed | 402 | 180 ms | $0.01 |
| 21 h ago | Passed | 402 | 779 ms | $0.01 |
Show 10 older checks
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.6 s | $0.01 |
| 31 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.6 s | $0.01 |
| 35 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.01 |
| 40 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.01 |
| 44 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.0 s | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 1.6 s | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 1.3 s | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 812 ms | $0.01 |