73trust / 100

AI Law Framework

by ailawframework.com in Productivity & SaaS

MCP serverPassing, checked 6 h ago

Decide whether AI may be used for a legal task, who drafts and who checks. Australian law.

https://ailawframework.com/mcp
Tools
19
open to any client
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
993 ms
1.7 s slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
6 h ago, next any minute now

Scan it nowHow to connect

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to connect

Add it to any MCP client that supports remote servers.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "ai-law-framework": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://ailawframework.com/mcp"
    }
  }
}

19 tools

  • start_task

    Opens a work record for one legal task and returns the clarifying questions the framework needs answered (step 1, define the task), less any already answered in `answers`. The first two are the country and, in Australia, the state or territory: ask them first. Read the skill…

  • record_answers

    Adds the user’s answers to the clarifying questions to the work record. Returns the questions still open, or, once all are answered, the research the task requires.

  • record_research

    Adds research findings, each with its source, quote and confirmation status, to the work record. Returns the required research still missing, or the scoring anchors and the governance ceiling the evidence sets.

  • assess_and_decide

    Scores the AI option on adoption, efficiency and governance (step 2), caps governance by the recorded evidence, scores the manual route, and returns the decision, its reasons and the order of preference.

  • plan_human_work

    Sets the level of each of the seven stages of the task (step 3) from the recorded answers, research and decision, and returns what the lawyer and the AI may and may not do at each stage.

  • work_record

    Returns the work record as markdown (steps 4 and 5): the task, the evidence, the decision, the plan, what the AI did, and the checks, approval and release left for the lawyer.

  • search_library

    Searches the framework’s published practice areas, tasks, jurisdiction versions, jurisdictions, firm-wide obligations, software profiles, precedents and workflows. Returns titles, ids, ailawframework.com links and their markdown versions.

  • get_task_guidance

    Returns one task from the practice library: how AI may be used, its level, what the lawyer must review, its checkpoints, restrictions and sources, and its jurisdiction versions.

  • get_jurisdiction_guidance

    Returns the framework’s notes for one jurisdiction, and which stored AI instruments apply to a task in a court or tribunal. Name the forum, or court "no" when no court is involved. A gap means no instrument is stored for that forum. It also returns the jurisdiction’s recorded…

  • get_software_profile

    Returns the framework’s research on one AI product and plan: its facts, the governance considerations found, and the cited sources with their review dates. Accepts a profile id or a product name.

  • search_precedents

    Searches the published precedent library (letters, agreements, clauses, checklists, forms, policies and more for every practice area) by title, summary and when to use it. Returns ids, titles, kinds, practice area ids, jurisdictions and the date each states the law as at. The…

  • get_precedent

    Returns one published precedent’s details: summary, when to use it, authorities, the AI-use guidance (level, what AI may and must not do, what the lawyer checks), licence, the date it states the law as at and how the library maintains it. The text itself is available through the…

  • get_started

    For a new user, or when asked what this is: what the AI Law Framework decides, the first questions it asks (country, then state or territory), the five steps, the skills and starting prompts, and a fictional sample matter the user can run to see a finished work record.

  • get_framework

    Returns the AI Law Framework’s rules: the five steps, the three pillars and their anchors, the decision rule, the four levels, the seven stages and their matrix, and the rules that admit no exception.

  • refine_legal_query

    Restates one Australian legal question and lists the clarifying questions still open: state or territory, dates, parties, forum, output and urgency.

  • get_practice_area_prompt

    Returns the published practice-area prompt for one Australian area. Court AI rules are attached when a jurisdiction code is given.

  • find_rules

    Returns the stored court and tribunal AI instruments that match a task and a forum, using the catalogue rule matcher. With a forum named, guidance for the jurisdiction that is not tagged to that forum is returned apart, in `profession_guidance`; read it too. Court decisions…

  • assess_tool_use

    Returns the catalogue adoption, efficiency and governance for one tool on one task, plus the matching court AI rules. Unlisted tools stay not_recorded.

  • disclosure_duties

    Returns the stored disclosure and verification duties for a forum and a document type. United States: the recorded court and client answers for the state, DC or federal courts as stored, and the stored rules and orders whose summaries say filers must disclose or certify.

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTime
6 h agoPassed2001.3 s
17 h agoPassed2001.4 s
29 h agoPassed200594 ms
39 h agoPassed200714 ms
2 days agoPassed200925 ms
Show 10 older checks
3 days agoPassed200594 ms
3 days agoPassed200564 ms
4 days agoPassed2001.3 s
4 days agoPassed200890 ms
5 days agoPassed200583 ms
6 days agoPassed200668 ms
6 days agoPassed200975 ms
7 days agoPassed200816 ms
7 days agoPassed2002.0 s
8 days agoPassed2001.3 s