78trust / 100

Bank

by gibai.app in Markets & finance

x402 APIPassing, checked 5 min ago

Bitcoin and digital-asset adoption profile for one named bank, from the Global Institutional Bitcoin Adoption Index. Returns its score out of 100, its rank among the world's 100 largest banks, a score for each of 16 activities (custody, spot trading, ETF access, derivatives, stablecoins, tokenization and more), and every scored change with a reason, a source URL and the event date. Shorthand resolves: Citi, JP Morgan, BofA. Free /banks lists accepted names; an unmatched name is not charged.

GET
https://gibai.app/bank/:name
Price
$0.01
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
211 ms
312 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
5 min ago, next in 24 min

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed

How to call it

GET https://gibai.app/bank/:name

Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://gibai.app/bank/:name?name=Citigroup

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
namestringYesBank name; common shorthand resolves. GET /banks lists accepted names.

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

{
  "bank": "Citigroup",
  "changes": [
    {
      "activity": "btc_custody",
      "date": "2026-09-03",
      "event_date": "2026-08-18",
      "new": "50",
      "old": "75",
      "origin": "auto",
      "reason": "Citi announced Bitcoin custody under Custody+ launching later in 2026; not yet live.",
      "source_url": "https://coinpaprika.com/news/citi-brings-bitcoin-into-bank-grade-custody/"
    }
  ],
  "country": "United States",
  "rank": 15,
  "report_date": "2026-09-10",
  "scores": {
    "btc_custody": 25,
    "btc_trading": 25,
    "stablecoin": 75
  },
  "total": 31.8
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://gibai.app/bank/:name?name=Citigroup'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://gibai.app/bank/:name?name=Citigroup' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgibai.app%2Fbank%2F%3Aname
const res = await pay("https://gibai.app/bank/:name?name=Citigroup");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://gibai.app/bank/:name?name=Citigroup")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
5 min agoPassed402175 ms$0.01
4 h agoPassed402210 ms$0.01
9 h agoPassed402228 ms$0.01
13 h agoPassed402186 ms$0.01
17 h agoPassed402237 ms$0.01
Show 10 older checks
22 h agoPassed402236 ms$0.01
26 h agoPassed402376 ms$0.01
30 h agoPassed402230 ms$0.01
34 h agoPassed402211 ms$0.01
38 h agoPassed402228 ms$0.01
41 h agoPassed402190 ms$0.01
45 h agoPassed402278 ms$0.01
2 days agoPassed402224 ms$0.01
2 days agoPassed402234 ms$0.01
2 days agoPassed402164 ms$0.01