Big O
by Systems Capacity Calculators in Developer tools
Compare growth classes (n, n log n, n^2, 2^n, n!) at a given n: operation counts, run time, largest n a time budget allows.
https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/big-o- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 64.3%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 530 ms
- 560 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 6 h ago, next in 14 min
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/big-o
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/big-o?budgetSeconds=1&n=1000&opsPerSecond=1000000000Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
budgetSeconds | number | No | Time budget in seconds for the 'largest n' column (default 1) |
n | number | Yes | Input size n, 1 to 1e12 (for 2^n and n! the count is shown as a power of ten) |
opsPerSecond | number | No | Operations per second of your machine (default 1e9) |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 43 lines
{
"asOf": "2026-10-11T20:19:38.657Z",
"budgetSeconds": 1,
"classes": [
{
"class": "O(1)",
"feasibleWithinBudget": true,
"largestNWithinBudget": null,
"log10Operations": 0,
"name": "constant",
"operations": "1",
"seconds": 1e-9,
"time": "under a microsecond"
},
{
"class": "O(log n)",
"feasibleWithinBudget": true,
"largestNWithinBudget": null,
"log10Operations": 0.999,
"name": "logarithmic",
"operations": "10",
"seconds": 9.965784284662073e-9,
"time": "under a microsecond"
}
],
"degraded": false,
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"n": 1000,
"notChecked": [
"constant factors, caches, parallelism and memory: Big-O ignores them and real programs differ by 10x or more",
"average versus worst case, and space complexity",
"…1 more"
],
"operationBudget": 1000000000,
"opsPerSecond": 1000000000,
"reasons": [
"Operation counts are the class formula with constant 1 (log base 2), so they compare growth rates, not real run times.",
"Largest n = the biggest input whose step count stays within the budget (budget seconds x ops per second)."
],
"source": "computed locally",
"summary": "n = 1,000 at 1.0e+9 ops/s: O(1), O(log n), O(n), O(n log n), O(n^2), O(n^3) fit in 1 s; too slow: O(2^n), O(n!).",
"verdict": "SOME_INFEASIBLE"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/big-o?budgetSeconds=1&n=1000&opsPerSecond=1000000000'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/big-o?budgetSeconds=1&n=1000&opsPerSecond=1000000000' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fbig-o
const res = await pay("https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/big-o?budgetSeconds=1&n=1000&opsPerSecond=1000000000");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/big-o?budgetSeconds=1&n=1000&opsPerSecond=1000000000")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 h ago | Passed | 402 | 533 ms | $0.02 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 560 ms | $0.02 |
| 2 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 106 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 88 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 83 ms | - |
Show 9 older checks
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 224 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 184 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 186 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 549 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 559 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 530 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 493 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 189 ms | $0.02 |
| 7 days ago | Passed | 402 | 274 ms | $0.02 |