Bridge Status
by Bridge Status Tracker in Onchain & crypto
The other half of bridge-route. A bridge takes minutes with funds in flight, and from the source chain alone an agent cannot tell if it completed. Tracks a transfer by its source tx hash via the LiFi status API: completed (with the receiving tx), pending (poll again), failed (with the reason), or not-found (not a bridge tx, or too early to index). Pass from/to/bridge for a faster lookup. not-found reads as 'not indexed yet', never 'failed'. Not financial advice.
https://402.com.tr/api/x402/bridge-status- Price
- $0.01
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 501 ms
- 635 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 3 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://402.com.tr/api/x402/bridge-status
Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://402.com.tr/api/x402/bridge-status?from=base&to=arbitrum&txHash=0x68fdf10f8eb842afcddf79b2a779ed78e5be35d698e95cee1966f1787eb02b5eParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
from | string | No | From chain (optional) |
to | string | No | To chain (optional) |
txHash | string | Yes | Source-chain tx hash |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"checkedAt": "2026-10-09T11:06:26.575Z",
"txHash": "0x68fdf10f8eb842afcddf79b2a779ed78e5be35d698e95cee1966f1787eb02b5e",
"verdict": "not_found"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://402.com.tr/api/x402/bridge-status?from=base&to=arbitrum&txHash=0x68fdf10f8eb842afcddf79b2a779ed78e5be35d698e95cee1966f1787eb02b5e'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://402.com.tr/api/x402/bridge-status?from=base&to=arbitrum&txHash=0x68fdf10f8eb842afcddf79b2a779ed78e5be35d698e95cee1966f1787eb02b5e' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2F402.com.tr%2Fapi%2Fx402%2Fbridge-status
const res = await pay("https://402.com.tr/api/x402/bridge-status?from=base&to=arbitrum&txHash=0x68fdf10f8eb842afcddf79b2a779ed78e5be35d698e95cee1966f1787eb02b5e");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://402.com.tr/api/x402/bridge-status?from=base&to=arbitrum&txHash=0x68fdf10f8eb842afcddf79b2a779ed78e5be35d698e95cee1966f1787eb02b5e")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 h ago | Passed | 402 | 597 ms | $0.01 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 532 ms | $0.01 |
| 12 h ago | Passed | 402 | 530 ms | $0.01 |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 402 | 743 ms | $0.01 |
| 21 h ago | Passed | 402 | 478 ms | $0.01 |
Show 10 older checks
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 474 ms | $0.01 |
| 30 h ago | Passed | 402 | 385 ms | $0.01 |
| 34 h ago | Passed | 402 | 394 ms | $0.01 |
| 38 h ago | Passed | 402 | 487 ms | $0.01 |
| 42 h ago | Passed | 402 | 505 ms | $0.01 |
| 47 h ago | Passed | 402 | 624 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 534 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 339 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 477 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 459 ms | $0.01 |