Budget Split
by Party & Event Planner in Other
Split an event budget by percent into exact-cent amounts that add up to the total (largest-remainder rounding).
https://party-event-calc.x402tookit.com/budget-split- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 50.0%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 513 ms
- 536 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Failed
- 25 h ago, next in 44 min
Reliability
Latest check failed 25 h ago: Expected HTTP 402, got 530
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://party-event-calc.x402tookit.com/budget-split
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://party-event-calc.x402tookit.com/budget-split?categories=Venue%3A30%2CFood%3A35%2CEntertainment%3A10%2CDecor%3A10%2COther%3A5%2CContingency%3A10&totalBudget=5000Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
categories | string | No | Comma list of label:percent adding to 100 (default Venue:30,Food:35,Entertainment:10,Decor:10,Other:5,Contingency:10) |
totalBudget | number | Yes | Total budget in dollars |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 31 lines
{
"allocatedTotal": 5000,
"allocations": [
{
"amount": 1500,
"category": "Venue",
"percent": 30
},
{
"amount": 1750,
"category": "Food",
"percent": 35
}
],
"asOf": "2026-10-12T01:45:03.722Z",
"categoryCount": 6,
"degraded": false,
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"notChecked": [
"whether the percents suit your event (they are your inputs, not a benchmark)",
"taxes, gratuity and fees inside each category",
"…1 more"
],
"reasons": [
"Each amount is the percent of the total in whole cents; leftover cents go to the largest fractional parts so the amounts add up exactly."
],
"source": "computed locally (percent of the total in cents, remainder cents to the largest fractions)",
"summary": "5000 split 6 way(s); the biggest share is Food at 1750.",
"totalBudget": 5000,
"verdict": "COMPUTED"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://party-event-calc.x402tookit.com/budget-split?categories=Venue%3A30%2CFood%3A35%2CEntertainment%3A10%2CDecor%3A10%2COther%3A5%2CContingency%3A10&totalBudget=5000'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://party-event-calc.x402tookit.com/budget-split?categories=Venue%3A30%2CFood%3A35%2CEntertainment%3A10%2CDecor%3A10%2COther%3A5%2CContingency%3A10&totalBudget=5000' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fparty-event-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fbudget-split
const res = await pay("https://party-event-calc.x402tookit.com/budget-split?categories=Venue%3A30%2CFood%3A35%2CEntertainment%3A10%2CDecor%3A10%2COther%3A5%2CContingency%3A10&totalBudget=5000");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://party-event-calc.x402tookit.com/budget-split?categories=Venue%3A30%2CFood%3A35%2CEntertainment%3A10%2CDecor%3A10%2COther%3A5%2CContingency%3A10&totalBudget=5000")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 95 ms | - |
| 2 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 151 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 97 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 99 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 108 ms | - |
Show 9 older checks
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 202 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 168 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 536 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 534 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 533 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 513 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 493 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 494 ms | $0.02 |
| 7 days ago | Passed | 402 | 411 ms | $0.02 |