75trust / 100
Business Plan Outline Execute
by tradepilotusa.com in Markets & finance
x402 APIPassing, checked 1 h ago
Structure supplied business assumptions into a plan, evidence gaps, experiments, and milestones; avoid invented financial results. Uses buyer-supplied information only; no external research or outbound actions. Returns a draft for human review.
POST https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/business_plan_outline/execute
Last 30 days
All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked
- Uptime
- 100%
- Response time
- 790 ms typical, 1.2 s slowest 5%
- Last check
- 1 h ago
- Next check
- any minute now
How to call it
# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X POST "https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/business_plan_outline/execute" \
-H "content-type: application/json" \
-d '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Structure supplied business assumptions into a plan, evidence gaps, experiments, and milestones; avoid invented financial results. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}'import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
const client = new x402Client().register(
"eip155:8453",
new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Fbusiness_plan_outline%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/business_plan_outline/execute", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Structure supplied business assumptions into a plan, evidence gaps, experiments, and milestones; avoid invented financial results. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}),
});
console.log(await res.json());Example input
{
"audience": "Business operations manager",
"brief": "Structure supplied business assumptions into a plan, evidence gaps, experiments, and milestones; avoid invented financial results. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
"source_text": "Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."
}Example output
{
"artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Business Plan Draft for Scheduling Improvement Project: Example Door Company\n\n### Objective\nImprove the scheduling process for residential entry door installations in Dallas over a six-week period.\n\n### Current Situation\n- Installation team: Two-person crew\n- Consultations: Weekdays only\n- Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references, and measured outcomes are unknown.\n\n### Proposed Vendor Options\n| Vendor | Proposal | Cost (Fictional) | Components | Evaluation Criteria |\n|---",
"assumptions": [
"Improving scheduling will increase operational efficiency.",
"A process assessment can identify scheduling inefficiencies."
],
"evidence_gaps": [
"Current booking volume and scheduling performance metrics.",
"Customer feedback on scheduling and consultation experience."
],
"provenance": {
"external_research_performed": false,
"generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:41:35.346Z",
"source": "buyer_supplied"
},
"request_id": "example_business_plan_outline",
"requires_human_review": true,
"summary": "A six-week plan to improve scheduling for Example Door Company using vendor assessments and potential staff training. The plan highlights key assumptions, identifies critical data gaps such as current",
"task": "business_plan_outline"
}Security scan
- No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h ago | Passed | 402 | 697 ms | $0.25 |
| 5 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.3 s | $0.25 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.25 |
| 13 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.25 |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.0 s | $0.25 |
| 20 h ago | Passed | 402 | 632 ms | $0.25 |
| 24 h ago | Passed | 402 | 724 ms | $0.25 |
| 27 h ago | Passed | 402 | 711 ms | $0.25 |
| 31 h ago | Passed | 402 | 696 ms | $0.25 |
| 34 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.2 s | $0.25 |
| 38 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.1 s | $0.25 |
| 42 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.0 s | $0.25 |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 402 | 802 ms | $0.25 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 790 ms | $0.25 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 759 ms | $0.25 |