Calc Ohts
by magent in AI models & inference
OHTS-EGPS 2007 Table 6: 5-year primary open-angle glaucoma risk in untreated ocular hypertension from age, mean IOP (mm Hg), mean central corneal thickness (microns), mean vertical cup-disc ratio, and mean Humphrey pattern standard deviation (dB). Point bands map to 4%, 10%, 15%, 20%, or 33%. No race (dropped in the multivariate model). No diabetes term. Not a glaucoma diagnosis or drop order. magent does not measure IOP or pachymetry.
https://api.magentlab.com/api/calc/ohts- Price
- $0.005
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 237 ms
- 2.4 s slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 5 h ago, next in 35 min
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://api.magentlab.com/api/calc/ohts
Each call costs $0.005 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://api.magentlab.com/api/calc/ohts?age=55&cct_microns=540&iop_mm_hg=24&psd_db=2.2&vertical_cd_ratio=0.4Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
age | integer | Yes | Age in years (integer 30-80). OHTS enrolled 40-80; EGPS enrolled age >30. magent accepts 30-80 only. Table 6: <45=0, 45 to <55=1, 55 to <65=2, 65 to <75=3, >=75=4. |
cct_microns | number | Yes | Mean central corneal thickness in microns (475-650), average of the two eyes. Table 6: >=600=0, 576 to <600=1, 551 to <576=2, 526 to <551=3, <=525=4. magent does not perform pachymetry. |
iop_mm_hg | number | Yes | Mean untreated intraocular pressure in mm Hg (20-32), average of the two eyes after multiple Goldmann readings as in the paper. Table 6: <22=0, 22 to <24=1, 24 to <26=2, 26 to <28=3, >=28=4. magent does not measure IOP. |
psd_db | number | Yes | Mean Humphrey pattern standard deviation in dB (0.5-8), average of the two eyes. Table 6: <1.8=0, 1.8 to <2.0=1, 2 to <2.4=2, 2.4 to <2.8=3, >=2.8=4. magent does not run perimetry. |
vertical_cd_ratio | number | Yes | Mean vertical cup-disc ratio by contour (0-1), average of the two eyes. Table 6: <0.3=0, 0.3 to <0.4=1, 0.4 to <0.5=2, 0.5 to <0.6=3, >=0.6=4. magent does not grade the disc. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"age": 55,
"cct_microns": 540,
"citation": {
"authors": "Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group; European Glaucoma Prevention Study Group; Gordon MO, Torri V, Miglior S, Beiser JA, Floriani I, Miller JP, Gao F, Adamsons I, Poli D, D'Agostino RB, Kass MA",
"doi": "10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.08.031",
"id": "ohts-egps-2007",
"pmid": "17070597",
"source": "Ophthalmology. 2007;114(1):10-19",
"title": "A validated prediction model for the development of primary open-angle glaucoma in individuals with ocular hypertension"
},
"disclaimer": "Not a medical device. Deterministic published-formula or published-code output for autonomous agents. A licensed clinician remains responsible for patient care and billing submissions.",
"formula": "ohts",
"formula_expression": "OHTS-EGPS 2007 Table 6 points: age <45=0, 45 to <55=1, 55 to <65=2, 65 to <75=3, >=75=4; mean IOP mm Hg <22=0, 22 to <24=1, 24 to <26=2, 26 to <28=3, >=28=4; mean CCT microns >=600=0, 576 to <600=1, 551 to <576=2, 526 to <551=3, <=525=4; mean vertical cup-disc ratio <0.3=0, 0.3 to <0.4=1, 0.4 to <0.5=2, 0.5 to <0.6=3, >=0.6=4; mean Humphrey PSD dB <1.8=0, 1.8 to <2.0=1, 2 to <2.4=2, 2.4 to <2.8=3, >=2.8=4; sum 0-6 -> 4.0% (<=4.0%), 7-8 -> 10%, 9-10 -> 15%, 11-12 -> 20%, >12 -> 33% (>=33%); no race; no diabetes; not a glaucoma diagnosis",
"iop_mm_hg": 24,
"points": 11,
"psd_db": 2.2,
"risk_5y_percent": 20,
"vertical_cd_ratio": 0.4
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.005.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://api.magentlab.com/api/calc/ohts?age=55&cct_microns=540&iop_mm_hg=24&psd_db=2.2&vertical_cd_ratio=0.4'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://api.magentlab.com/api/calc/ohts?age=55&cct_microns=540&iop_mm_hg=24&psd_db=2.2&vertical_cd_ratio=0.4' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.005 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.005" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.005 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.magentlab.com%2Fapi%2Fcalc%2Fohts
const res = await pay("https://api.magentlab.com/api/calc/ohts?age=55&cct_microns=540&iop_mm_hg=24&psd_db=2.2&vertical_cd_ratio=0.4");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.005 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.005"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://api.magentlab.com/api/calc/ohts?age=55&cct_microns=540&iop_mm_hg=24&psd_db=2.2&vertical_cd_ratio=0.4")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 h ago | Passed | 402 | 235 ms | $0.005 |
| 16 h ago | Passed | 402 | 301 ms | $0.005 |
| 25 h ago | Passed | 402 | 329 ms | $0.005 |
| 35 h ago | Passed | 402 | 221 ms | $0.005 |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 402 | 297 ms | $0.005 |
Show 6 older checks
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 452 ms | $0.005 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 136 ms | $0.005 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 2.4 s | $0.005 |
| 4 days ago | Passed | 402 | 237 ms | $0.005 |
| 4 days ago | Passed | 402 | 132 ms | $0.005 |
| 4 days ago | Passed | 402 | 137 ms | $0.005 |