Chain Address
by Duo Data Utilities in Onchain & crypto
Identify which blockchain an address belongs to and validate its encoding: EVM EIP-55 checksum, Bitcoin base58check and bech32/bech32m with witness version, Solana base58 and on-curve check, Cosmos bech32 with its HRP, Tron, XRP, Litecoin, Dogecoin, Cardano, Polkadot SS58 and Algorand. Returns every chain the address is valid for (ambiguous when several match), the checksummed form for EVM addresses, and the reason a check failed, including unrecognised_format.
https://api.duoleads.com/v1/chain/address- Price
- $0.05
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 539 ms
- 717 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 14 min ago, next in 18 min
Reliability
How to call it
GET https://api.duoleads.com/v1/chain/address
Each call costs $0.05 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://api.duoleads.com/v1/chain/address?address=0xd8da6bf26964af9d7eed9e03e53415d37aa96045Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
address | string | Yes | Address to identify and validate. |
chain_id | string | No | EVM chain id; enables EIP-1191 chain-salted checksum validation. |
expect | string | No | Restrict the check to one chain id. One of: evm, bitcoin, solana, cosmos, tron, xrp, cardano, polkadot, algorand, litecoin, dogecoin. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 31 lines
{
"data": {
"ambiguous": false,
"checksum": {
"checksum_valid": true,
"checksummed": "0xd8dA6BF26964aF9D7eEd9e03E53415D37aA96045",
"eip1191_applied": false,
"input_form": "lowercase"
},
"matches": [
{
"chain": "evm",
"detail": {},
"format": "hex20",
"reason": "no_checksum",
"valid": true
}
],
"valid": true
},
"meta": {
"computed_at": "2026-09-28T12:00:00.000Z",
"deterministic": true,
"disclaimer": "Factual output of a deterministic computation over public data. Provided as is, with no warranty of accuracy, completeness or availability. Not investment, financial, legal, tax, medical or any other professional advice, and not a recommendation. Verify before relying on it. Terms: https://api.duoleads.com/terms",
"price_usd": "0.05",
"request_id": "01K6B7Q4ZC8H3F2M9WXR5TYN0D"
},
"ok": true,
"route": "/v1/chain/address",
"version": "1.0.0"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.05.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://api.duoleads.com/v1/chain/address?address=0xd8da6bf26964af9d7eed9e03e53415d37aa96045'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://api.duoleads.com/v1/chain/address?address=0xd8da6bf26964af9d7eed9e03e53415d37aa96045' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.05 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.05" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.05 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.duoleads.com%2Fv1%2Fchain%2Faddress
const res = await pay("https://api.duoleads.com/v1/chain/address?address=0xd8da6bf26964af9d7eed9e03e53415d37aa96045");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.05 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.05"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://api.duoleads.com/v1/chain/address?address=0xd8da6bf26964af9d7eed9e03e53415d37aa96045")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 min ago | Passed | 402 | 573 ms | $0.05 |
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 539 ms | $0.05 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 607 ms | $0.05 |
| 13 h ago | Passed | 402 | 535 ms | $0.05 |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 402 | 612 ms | $0.05 |
Show 10 older checks
| 21 h ago | Passed | 402 | 442 ms | $0.05 |
| 25 h ago | Passed | 402 | 295 ms | $0.05 |
| 29 h ago | Passed | 402 | 140 ms | $0.05 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 605 ms | $0.05 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 717 ms | $0.05 |
| 40 h ago | Passed | 402 | 372 ms | $0.05 |
| 44 h ago | Passed | 402 | 508 ms | $0.05 |
| 47 h ago | Passed | 402 | 159 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 615 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 167 ms | $0.05 |