Check
by CF Package Check in Developer tools
Is this WordPress plugin, npm package or PyPI project abandoned? Status, 0-100 abandonment-risk score, months since last update, and the signals behind it.
https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 670 ms
- 2.3 s slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 7 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=expressParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
ecosystem | string | Yes | One of: wordpress, npm, pypi. |
name | string | Yes | Package name, PyPI project, or WordPress.org plugin slug |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"as_of": "2026-09-11T07:36:46.761Z",
"ecosystem": "npm",
"exists": true,
"last_release": {
"date": "2020-02-11T16:35:36.122Z",
"version": "2.88.2"
},
"months_since_update": 78,
"name": "request",
"score": 100,
"signals": [
"deprecated on npm: \"request has been deprecated, see https://github.com/request/request/issues/3142\"",
"last update 78 months ago (2020-02-11, 2.88.2)",
"50,778,952 downloads last month"
],
"status": "deprecated"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev%2Fv1%2Fcheck
const res = await pay("https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 531 ms | $0.02 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 498 ms | $0.02 |
| 28 h ago | Passed | 402 | 1.2 s | $0.02 |
| 38 h ago | Passed | 402 | 579 ms | $0.02 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 504 ms | $0.02 |
Show 10 older checks
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 768 ms | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 670 ms | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 624 ms | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 674 ms | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 879 ms | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 2.1 s | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 798 ms | $0.02 |
| 4 days ago | Passed | 402 | 588 ms | $0.02 |
| 4 days ago | Passed | 402 | 526 ms | $0.02 |
| 4 days ago | Passed | 402 | 2.3 s | $0.02 |