72trust / 100

Check

by CF Package Check in Developer tools

x402 APIPassing, checked 7 h ago

Is this WordPress plugin, npm package or PyPI project abandoned? Status, 0-100 abandonment-risk score, months since last update, and the signals behind it.

GET
https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check
Price
$0.02
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
670 ms
2.3 s slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
7 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

GET https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check

Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
ecosystemstringYes One of: wordpress, npm, pypi.
namestringYesPackage name, PyPI project, or WordPress.org plugin slug

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

{
  "as_of": "2026-09-11T07:36:46.761Z",
  "ecosystem": "npm",
  "exists": true,
  "last_release": {
    "date": "2020-02-11T16:35:36.122Z",
    "version": "2.88.2"
  },
  "months_since_update": 78,
  "name": "request",
  "score": 100,
  "signals": [
    "deprecated on npm: \"request has been deprecated, see https://github.com/request/request/issues/3142\"",
    "last update 78 months ago (2020-02-11, 2.88.2)",
    "50,778,952 downloads last month"
  ],
  "status": "deprecated"
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev%2Fv1%2Fcheck
const res = await pay("https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://cf-package-check.cf-exclusion-check.workers.dev/v1/check?ecosystem=npm&name=express")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
7 h agoPassed402531 ms$0.02
18 h agoPassed402498 ms$0.02
28 h agoPassed4021.2 s$0.02
38 h agoPassed402579 ms$0.02
2 days agoPassed402504 ms$0.02
Show 10 older checks
2 days agoPassed402768 ms$0.02
3 days agoPassed402670 ms$0.02
3 days agoPassed402624 ms$0.02
3 days agoPassed402674 ms$0.02
3 days agoPassed402879 ms$0.02
3 days agoPassed4022.1 s$0.02
3 days agoPassed402798 ms$0.02
4 days agoPassed402588 ms$0.02
4 days agoPassed402526 ms$0.02
4 days agoPassed4022.3 s$0.02