Cidr Aggregate
by Network Calc in Other
Summarise IPv4 or IPv6 CIDR blocks into the minimal set (merging adjacent and overlapping blocks) plus the covering supernet.
https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/cidr-aggregate- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 53.3%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 499 ms
- 621 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 12 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/cidr-aggregate
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/cidr-aggregate?cidrs=10.0.0.0%2F24%2C10.0.1.0%2F24%2C10.0.2.0%2F25%2C10.0.2.128%2F25%2C10.0.3.0%2F24%2C10.0.8.0%2F24Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
cidrs | string | Yes | Prefixes separated by commas, spaces or newlines, for example 10.0.0.0/24,10.0.1.0/24,10.0.3.0/24 |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 33 lines
{
"asOf": "2026-10-11T14:45:30.250Z",
"degraded": false,
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"inputCount": 6,
"ipv4": [
"10.0.0.0/22",
"10.0.8.0/24"
],
"ipv4AddressesCovered": "1280",
"ipv4SingleSupernetExact": false,
"ipv4Supernet": "10.0.0.0/20",
"ipv4SupernetGap": "2816",
"ipv6": [],
"ipv6AddressesCovered": "0",
"ipv6SingleSupernetExact": false,
"ipv6Supernet": null,
"ipv6SupernetGap": "0",
"notChecked": [
"whether you may announce the summary: aggregating routes that include space you do not hold creates a hijack risk",
"route-map or IRR/RPKI consequences of changing announced prefixes",
"…1 more"
],
"outputCount": 2,
"reasons": [
"Overlapping and adjacent blocks are merged, then the merged ranges are written as the fewest aligned CIDR blocks (the minimal cover is unique).",
"The single covering supernet also contains addresses that are NOT in your list (see the gap): do not announce it unless you hold all of that space."
],
"reductionPercent": 66.67,
"source": "RFC 4632 CIDR aggregation (exact minimal cover by aligned blocks), computed locally",
"summary": "6 prefixes reduce to 2: IPv4 10.0.0.0/22, 10.0.8.0/24.",
"verdict": "AGGREGATED"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/cidr-aggregate?cidrs=10.0.0.0%2F24%2C10.0.1.0%2F24%2C10.0.2.0%2F25%2C10.0.2.128%2F25%2C10.0.3.0%2F24%2C10.0.8.0%2F24'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/cidr-aggregate?cidrs=10.0.0.0%2F24%2C10.0.1.0%2F24%2C10.0.2.0%2F25%2C10.0.2.128%2F25%2C10.0.3.0%2F24%2C10.0.8.0%2F24' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnetwork-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fcidr-aggregate
const res = await pay("https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/cidr-aggregate?cidrs=10.0.0.0%2F24%2C10.0.1.0%2F24%2C10.0.2.0%2F25%2C10.0.2.128%2F25%2C10.0.3.0%2F24%2C10.0.8.0%2F24");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://network-calc.x402tookit.com/cidr-aggregate?cidrs=10.0.0.0%2F24%2C10.0.1.0%2F24%2C10.0.2.0%2F25%2C10.0.2.128%2F25%2C10.0.3.0%2F24%2C10.0.8.0%2F24")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 h ago | Passed | 402 | 522 ms | $0.02 |
| 43 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 100 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 85 ms | - |
| 4 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 104 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 94 ms | - |
Show 10 older checks
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 50 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 165 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 197 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 499 ms | $0.02 |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 533 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 621 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 505 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 207 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 478 ms | $0.02 |
| 7 days ago | Passed | 402 | 190 ms | $0.02 |