34trust / 100

Clamp Fluid

by CSS Design Calc in Other

x402 APIFailing, checked 25 h ago

Generate a CSS clamp() that scales a size linearly between a min and max viewport width, in rem, with the exact slope.

GET
https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/clamp-fluid
Price
$0.02
per call in USDC
Uptime
55.6%
last 30 days
Response time
514 ms
967 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Failed
25 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Latest check failed 25 h ago: Expected HTTP 402, got 530

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

GET https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/clamp-fluid

Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/clamp-fluid?maxSize=24&maxViewport=1200&minSize=16&minViewport=320&rootPx=16

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
atnumberNoOptional viewport width in px to evaluate the result at
maxSizenumberYesSize at the maximum viewport, in px
maxViewportnumberNoViewport width where scaling ends, px (default 1200)
minSizenumberYesSize at the minimum viewport, in px
minViewportnumberNoViewport width where scaling starts, px (default 320)
rootPxnumberNoRoot font size in px for the rem output (default 16)

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

Example response, 28 lines
{
  "asOf": "2026-10-11T14:32:43.131Z",
  "css": "clamp(1rem, 0.8182rem + 0.9091vw, 1.5rem)",
  "cssInPx": "clamp(16px, 13.0909px + 0.9091vw, 24px)",
  "degraded": false,
  "disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
  "evaluatedAtViewport": null,
  "interceptPx": 13.09090909,
  "interceptRem": 0.81818182,
  "maxRem": 1.5,
  "minRem": 1,
  "notChecked": [
    "user zoom and text-only zoom: using rem plus vw keeps text resizable, but a viewport-only value would not (WCAG 1.4.4 needs zoom to still scale text)",
    "container width: the slope is in vw, so it follows the viewport, not the component",
    "…1 more"
  ],
  "reasons": [
    "Slope 0.909091vw; intercept 13.090909px (0.818182rem).",
    "Below the minimum viewport the size stays at the minimum, above the maximum viewport it stays at the maximum."
  ],
  "rootPx": 16,
  "sizeAtMidpointPx": 20,
  "sizeAtViewportPx": null,
  "slopeVw": 0.90909091,
  "source": "Linear interpolation; the clamp() form follows CSS Values and Units Level 4, computed locally",
  "summary": "clamp(1rem, 0.8182rem + 0.9091vw, 1.5rem): 16px at 320px wide to 24px at 1200px.",
  "verdict": "COMPUTED"
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/clamp-fluid?maxSize=24&maxViewport=1200&minSize=16&minViewport=320&rootPx=16'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/clamp-fluid?maxSize=24&maxViewport=1200&minSize=16&minViewport=320&rootPx=16' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcss-design-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fclamp-fluid
const res = await pay("https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/clamp-fluid?maxSize=24&maxViewport=1200&minSize=16&minViewport=320&rootPx=16");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/clamp-fluid?maxSize=24&maxViewport=1200&minSize=16&minViewport=320&rootPx=16")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
25 h agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530137 ms-
37 h agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530123 ms-
2 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530109 ms-
3 days agoPassed402489 ms$0.02
3 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530107 ms-
Show 10 older checks
3 days agoPassed402539 ms$0.02
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 53053098 ms-
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530126 ms-
5 days agoPassed402511 ms$0.02
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530203 ms-
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530134 ms-
5 days agoPassed402520 ms$0.02
5 days agoPassed402739 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402566 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402514 ms$0.02