34trust / 100

Color Blind Sim

by Color and Design Tools in Other

x402 APIFailing, checked 28 h ago

Simulate protanopia, deuteranopia and tritanopia on a color, or on a text/background pair with the contrast that remains.

GET
https://color-design.x402tookit.com/color-blind-sim
Price
$0.02
per call in USDC
Uptime
57.9%
last 30 days
Response time
541 ms
2.7 s slowest 5%
Last check
Failed
28 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Latest check failed 28 h ago: Expected HTTP 402, got 530

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

GET https://color-design.x402tookit.com/color-blind-sim

Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://color-design.x402tookit.com/color-blind-sim?background=2ecc71&color=e74c3c

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
backgroundstringNoOptional background hex to check the pair's contrast
colorstringYesHex color (or the foreground of a pair)

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

Example response, 37 lines
{
  "asOf": "2026-10-11T04:02:40.219Z",
  "background": "#2ecc71",
  "degraded": false,
  "disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
  "normalContrast": 1.82,
  "notChecked": [
    "partial (anomalous) color vision, which is more common than full dichromacy",
    "monochromacy",
    "…1 more"
  ],
  "original": "#e74c3c",
  "reasons": [
    "Machado, Oliveira and Fernandes (2009) matrices at full severity, applied in linear RGB.",
    "Red-green pairs that differ only in hue are the usual failure: add a lightness difference."
  ],
  "simulations": {
    "deuteranopia": {
      "background": "#baae77",
      "color": "#9f8f36",
      "contrast": 1.46
    },
    "protanopia": {
      "background": "#ccbb6a",
      "color": "#786d39",
      "contrast": 2.68
    },
    "tritanopia": {
      "background": "#00c9b6",
      "color": "#fe1b49",
      "contrast": 1.84
    }
  },
  "source": "computed locally",
  "summary": "#e74c3c on #2ecc71: 1.82:1 normally; protanopia 2.68:1, deuteranopia 1.46:1, tritanopia 1.84:1.",
  "verdict": "PAIR_HOLDS_UP"
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://color-design.x402tookit.com/color-blind-sim?background=2ecc71&color=e74c3c'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://color-design.x402tookit.com/color-blind-sim?background=2ecc71&color=e74c3c' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcolor-design.x402tookit.com%2Fcolor-blind-sim
const res = await pay("https://color-design.x402tookit.com/color-blind-sim?background=2ecc71&color=e74c3c");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://color-design.x402tookit.com/color-blind-sim?background=2ecc71&color=e74c3c")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
28 h agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530136 ms-
41 h agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530219 ms-
2 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530118 ms-
3 days agoPassed402521 ms$0.02
3 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530123 ms-
Show 10 older checks
4 days agoPassed402579 ms$0.02
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 53053092 ms-
4 days agoPassed402553 ms$0.02
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 53053097 ms-
5 days agoPassed402541 ms$0.02
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530174 ms-
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530213 ms-
5 days agoPassed402502 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402515 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed4021.2 s$0.02