Composite Breadth
by CRYPTYX in Onchain & crypto
Universe-wide composite breadth at one horizon — bullish/bearish/neutral counts and percentages across 200+ assets, sliced by regime, with full per-asset stance list. Is this rally broad or concentrated?
https://cryptyx.ai/api/signals/composite/breadth- Price
- $0.05
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 283 ms
- 455 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 2 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://cryptyx.ai/api/signals/composite/breadth
Each call costs $0.05 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://cryptyx.ai/api/signals/composite/breadth?day=2026-06-18&horizon=7d&threshold=0.05Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
day | string | No | Optional asof_day in YYYY-MM-DD format. Defaults to latest available. |
horizon | string | No | Composite horizon (default 7d) One of: 7d, 14d, 30d. |
threshold | number | No | Score threshold for bullish/bearish classification, 0-1 (default 0.05) |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 73 lines
{
"asof_day": "2026-06-18",
"assets": [
{
"asset": "BTC",
"rank": 1,
"regime": "EXP_HV_HF",
"regime_confidence": 0.712,
"score": 0.4231,
"stance": "bullish"
},
{
"asset": "ETH",
"rank": 2,
"regime": "EXP_HV_HF",
"regime_confidence": 0.684,
"score": 0.3845,
"stance": "bullish"
},
{
"asset": "SOL",
"rank": 8,
"regime": "EXP_HV_HF",
"regime_confidence": 0.591,
"score": 0.1924,
"stance": "bullish"
}
],
"breadth": {
"bearish": 64,
"bearish_pct": 32.3,
"bullish": 72,
"bullish_pct": 36.4,
"neutral": 62,
"neutral_pct": 31.3,
"total": 198
},
"horizon": "7d",
"micro_summary": {
"flow": {
"ACCUM": 42,
"DISTRIB": 35,
"NEUTRAL": 121
},
"volatility": {
"COMPRESSED": 88,
"EXPANDING": 56,
"STABLE": 54
}
},
"ok": true,
"regime_breakdown": {
"CON_LV_LF": {
"bearish": 31,
"bullish": 6,
"neutral": 14,
"total": 51
},
"EXP_HV_HF": {
"bearish": 9,
"bullish": 28,
"neutral": 11,
"total": 48
},
"UNCLASSIFIED": {
"bearish": 7,
"bullish": 4,
"neutral": 9,
"total": 20
}
},
"threshold": 0.05
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.05.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://cryptyx.ai/api/signals/composite/breadth?day=2026-06-18&horizon=7d&threshold=0.05'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://cryptyx.ai/api/signals/composite/breadth?day=2026-06-18&horizon=7d&threshold=0.05' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.05 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.05" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.05 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcryptyx.ai%2Fapi%2Fsignals%2Fcomposite%2Fbreadth
const res = await pay("https://cryptyx.ai/api/signals/composite/breadth?day=2026-06-18&horizon=7d&threshold=0.05");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.05 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.05"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://cryptyx.ai/api/signals/composite/breadth?day=2026-06-18&horizon=7d&threshold=0.05")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 342 ms | $0.05 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 425 ms | $0.05 |
| 11 h ago | Passed | 402 | 339 ms | $0.05 |
| 15 h ago | Passed | 402 | 194 ms | $0.05 |
| 19 h ago | Passed | 402 | 229 ms | $0.05 |
Show 10 older checks
| 23 h ago | Passed | 402 | 326 ms | $0.05 |
| 28 h ago | Passed | 402 | 324 ms | $0.05 |
| 32 h ago | Passed | 402 | 402 ms | $0.05 |
| 36 h ago | Passed | 402 | 219 ms | $0.05 |
| 40 h ago | Passed | 402 | 274 ms | $0.05 |
| 44 h ago | Passed | 402 | 189 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 348 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 255 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 184 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 235 ms | $0.05 |