78trust / 100

Contract Amendments Reference Integrity Map

by mahastrategies.com in Onchain & crypto

x402 APIPassing, checked 2 h ago

Check declared amendment-parent links within one tenant and contract for missing parents, cycles and cross-scope references. No authenticity or enforceability judgment. Offline typed metadata only. Retained-result recovery: 24 hours; minimal receipt metadata: 90 days.

POST
https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/context/contract-amendments/reference-integrity-map
Price
$0.035
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
214 ms
214 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
2 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed

How to call it

POST https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/context/contract-amendments/reference-integrity-map

Each call costs $0.035023 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

POST https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/context/contract-amendments/reference-integrity-map
content-type: application/json

{
  "amendments": [
    {
      "contractId": "c1",
      "id": "a1",
      "parentId": null,
      "tenantId": "t1"
    }
  ],
  "contractId": "c1",
  "dataClass": "synthetic",
  "nonpersonalMetadata": true,
  "tenantId": "t1"
}

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
amendmentsarrayYes
contractIdstringYes
dataClassstringYes One of: public, synthetic.
nonpersonalMetadatabooleanYes
tenantIdstringYes

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

Example response, 29 lines
{
  "data": {
    "chargedAmount": "35023",
    "inputHash": "sha256:b8ea5b7a3fafee2f4e30d0102a3d23aa3d67a66689d61909600f4487d…",
    "limitations": [
      "Public or synthetic nonpersonal metadata only; these are caller …"
    ],
    "productId": "contract-amendments-reference-integrity-map",
    "result": {
      "authoritativeSourcesConsulted": false,
      "domainValidationEstablished": false,
      "findings": [],
      "method": "contract-amendments-reference-integrity-map/1",
      "metrics": [
        {
          "key": "checked-amendments",
          "recordId": "cohort",
          "value": "1"
        }
      ]
    },
    "resultHash": "sha256:ff8cae3e81f0d9f9dffb5b90b07a33ff5a7cc7c6ce400a87d0c516cca…",
    "version": "maha-typed-metadata-audit/1"
  },
  "proof": {
    "settlement_id": "0x00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000…"
  },
  "success": true
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.035023.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/context/contract-amendments/reference-integrity-map' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{"amendments":[{"contractId":"c1","id":"a1","parentId":null,"tenantId":"t1"}],"contractId":"c1","dataClass":"synthetic","nonpersonalMetadata":true,"tenantId":"t1"}'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/context/contract-amendments/reference-integrity-map' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{"amendments":[{"contractId":"c1","id":"a1","parentId":null,"tenantId":"t1"}],"contractId":"c1","dataClass":"synthetic","nonpersonalMetadata":true,"tenantId":"t1"}' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.035023 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.035023" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.035023 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mahastrategies.com%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fcontext%2Fcontract-amendments%2Freference-integrity-map&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/context/contract-amendments/reference-integrity-map", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({
    "amendments": [
      {
        "contractId": "c1",
        "id": "a1",
        "parentId": null,
        "tenantId": "t1"
      }
    ],
    "contractId": "c1",
    "dataClass": "synthetic",
    "nonpersonalMetadata": true,
    "tenantId": "t1"
  }),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.035023 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.035023"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.post(
        "https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/context/contract-amendments/reference-integrity-map",
        json={
            "amendments": [
                {
                    "contractId": "c1",
                    "id": "a1",
                    "parentId": None,
                    "tenantId": "t1",
                },
            ],
            "contractId": "c1",
            "dataClass": "synthetic",
            "nonpersonalMetadata": True,
            "tenantId": "t1",
        },
    )
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
2 h agoPassed402369 ms$0.035
7 h agoPassed402214 ms$0.035
16 h agoPassed402178 ms$0.035