81trust / 100
Council
by Agent Council in AI models & inference
x402 APIPassing, checked 4 h ago
Put one question to a panel of 3 different AI models and get a single verdict back. Each model answers independently, then a chair synthesizes: verdict, confidence, the points they all agreed on, the dissent, and what would flip the answer. Use it for judgement calls where one model's opinion is not enough: is this safe, is this worth it, which option. No account, no API key, one USDC micropayment per call.
GET https://council.cyberwarex.com/council
Last 30 days
All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked
- Uptime
- 100%
- Response time
- 234 ms typical, 234 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- 4 h ago
- Next check
- any minute now
How to call it
# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X GET "https://council.cyberwarex.com/council?q=Is+a+3-day-old+Base+lending+pool+paying+42%25+APY+with+an+unverified+proxy+admin+safe+to+deposit+into%3F"import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
const client = new x402Client().register(
"eip155:8453",
new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcouncil.cyberwarex.com%2Fcouncil
const res = await pay("https://council.cyberwarex.com/council?q=Is+a+3-day-old+Base+lending+pool+paying+42%25+APY+with+an+unverified+proxy+admin+safe+to+deposit+into%3F");
console.log(await res.json());Example input
{
"q": "Is a 3-day-old Base lending pool paying 42% APY with an unverified proxy admin safe to deposit into?"
}Example output
{
"confidence": 84,
"consensus": [
"A marketplace needs liquidity on two sides before it is useful"
],
"dissent": [
{
"point": "A thin marketplace is cheaper to test than it looks",
"seat": "builder"
}
],
"elapsed_sec": 6.9,
"mode": "quick",
"panel": [
{
"confidence": 85,
"model": "deepseek-v4.1-flash",
"position": "Single product first.",
"reasons": [
"No demand signal yet"
],
"risks": [
"Slower ceiling"
],
"seat": "analyst"
}
],
"question": "Should we ship the marketplace or the single product first?",
"rounds": 1,
"seats": 3,
"seats_invited": 4,
"verdict": "Ship the single product first. A marketplace needs both sides and the team has neither supply nor demand locked in.",
"watch_for": [
"An anchor supplier committing first",
"Distribution that already exists"
]
}Security scan
- No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 234 ms | $0.01 |