Csp Explain
by Dev Reference in Security & trust
Parse a Content-Security-Policy header value, explain each directive and flag risky settings like unsafe-inline.
https://dev-reference.x402tookit.com/csp-explain- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 53.9%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 529 ms
- 613 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Failed
- 23 h ago, next in 1 h
Reliability
Latest check failed 23 h ago: Expected HTTP 402, got 530
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://dev-reference.x402tookit.com/csp-explain
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://dev-reference.x402tookit.com/csp-explain?value=default-src+%27self%27%3B+script-src+%27self%27+%27unsafe-inline%27+https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.jsdelivr.net%3B+img-src+*Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
value | string | Yes | The header value, for example default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 52 lines
{
"asOf": "2026-10-11T14:26:44.554Z",
"degraded": false,
"directiveCount": 3,
"directives": [
{
"directive": "default-src",
"meaning": "Fallback for every fetch directive that is not set.",
"policy": 1,
"sources": "'self'"
},
{
"directive": "script-src",
"meaning": "Where scripts may load from and whether inline scripts and eval run.",
"policy": 1,
"sources": "'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net"
}
],
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"flags": [
{
"directive": "script-src",
"fix": "Use nonces or hashes instead of 'unsafe-inline'.",
"message": "'unsafe-inline' in script-src allows inline scripts and javascript: URLs, so injected markup can run script.",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
{
"directive": "script-src",
"fix": "Prefer nonces or hashes with 'strict-dynamic'.",
"message": "cdn.jsdelivr.net in script-src serves content an attacker can influence (user uploads, JSONP or open package mirrors), which bypasses the allow-list.",
"severity": "MEDIUM"
}
],
"highCount": 1,
"infoCount": 0,
"lowCount": 4,
"mediumCount": 2,
"notChecked": [
"whether the policy is delivered as enforced or report-only, or in a meta tag (frame-ancestors, report-uri and sandbox are ignored in meta tags)",
"your application's real behaviour: nonces must be unpredictable and unique per response, which cannot be seen in a header value",
"…3 more"
],
"policyCount": 1,
"reasons": [
"HIGH: 'unsafe-inline' in script-src allows inline scripts and javascript: URLs, so injected markup can run script.",
"MEDIUM: cdn.jsdelivr.net in script-src serves content an attacker can influence (user uploads, JSONP or open package mirrors), which bypasses the allow-list.",
"…5 more"
],
"source": "W3C Content Security Policy Level 3 rules, computed locally",
"summary": "3 directives parsed: 1 high, 2 medium, 4 low risk flags.",
"verdict": "CSP_HIGH_RISK"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://dev-reference.x402tookit.com/csp-explain?value=default-src+%27self%27%3B+script-src+%27self%27+%27unsafe-inline%27+https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.jsdelivr.net%3B+img-src+*'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://dev-reference.x402tookit.com/csp-explain?value=default-src+%27self%27%3B+script-src+%27self%27+%27unsafe-inline%27+https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.jsdelivr.net%3B+img-src+*' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdev-reference.x402tookit.com%2Fcsp-explain
const res = await pay("https://dev-reference.x402tookit.com/csp-explain?value=default-src+%27self%27%3B+script-src+%27self%27+%27unsafe-inline%27+https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.jsdelivr.net%3B+img-src+*");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://dev-reference.x402tookit.com/csp-explain?value=default-src+%27self%27%3B+script-src+%27self%27+%27unsafe-inline%27+https%3A%2F%2Fcdn.jsdelivr.net%3B+img-src+*")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 135 ms | - |
| 2 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 97 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 88 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 96 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 225 ms | - |
Show 8 older checks
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 152 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 533 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 529 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 613 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 546 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 520 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 495 ms | $0.02 |
| 7 days ago | Passed | 402 | 176 ms | $0.02 |