Cybergenic
by cybergenic.im in Other
Cancer gene co-occurrence and exclusivity in tumour cohorts, with confound controls and exact tests.
https://cybergenic.im/mcp?via=mcpregistry- Tools
- 9
- open to any client
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 306 ms
- 506 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 7 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to connect
Add it to any MCP client that supports remote servers.
{
"mcpServers": {
"cybergenic": {
"type": "http",
"url": "https://cybergenic.im/mcp?via=mcpregistry"
}
}
}9 tools
- lookup_gene_pair
Measured co-alteration statistics for two genes in every tumour cohort where Cybergenic's discovery scan tested the pair: tumours with both genes altered against the number expected, odds ratio, p-value and Benjamini-Hochberg q over that cohort's whole family of tested pairs…
- gene_partners
The genes whose driver mutations co-occur with, or are mutually exclusive with, a given gene in patient tumours, strongest first by Benjamini-Hochberg q, from every pair Cybergenic's discovery scan tested: one row per partner and independent patient source, with the tumours…
- search_findings
Search Cybergenic's published findings: gene-pair co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity, survival associations, CRISPR gene dependencies and single-gene leads, each with the verdict the engine measured (strengthened, weakened, inconclusive, artifact risk or novel lead) and the…
- get_finding
The full record of one Cybergenic finding, by id or permalink: what was measured and in which cohort, the statistics (the 2x2 table, odds ratio, p and q), the verdict and why, the confound checks, how many papers mention the genes together, CRISPR dependency and survival facts…
- get_track_record
Cybergenic's live track record: how many predictions it has locked in its hash-chained registry before re-testing them, how many replicated in an independent cohort against matched controls (including the less-studied-pair subset), and how many findings currently pass every…
- fisher_exact_test
Fisher's exact test for a 2x2 table [[a, b], [c, d]]: two-sided and both one-sided p-values (computed in log space, so a tiny p keeps its real exponent), the sample odds ratio, and the conditional maximum-likelihood odds ratio with its exact confidence interval (what R's…
- chi_square_test
Pearson chi-square test of independence for an r x c table of counts (2x2 up to 10x10), with Yates' correction for 2x2 tables and the G-test: statistic, degrees of freedom, p-value, expected counts, adjusted residuals, Cramér's V, whether Cochran's rule for the approximation…
- odds_ratio_relative_risk
Effect sizes for a 2x2 table [[a, b], [c, d]] whose rows are two groups and whose columns are outcome yes and no: the odds ratio (Woolf interval, and the conditional exact interval), the relative risk (Katz interval), the risk difference (Newcombe interval) and the number needed…
- fdr_correction
Multiple-testing correction for a list of p-values: Benjamini-Hochberg q-values and Benjamini-Yekutieli, Holm, Hochberg and Bonferroni adjusted p-values, the number of discoveries at alpha for each method, and the Benjamini-Hochberg cutoff rank. Pass family_size when more tests…
Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 h ago | Passed | 200 | 260 ms |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 200 | 297 ms |
| 26 h ago | Passed | 200 | 329 ms |
| 36 h ago | Passed | 200 | 269 ms |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 200 | 497 ms |
Show 10 older checks
| 2 days ago | Passed | 200 | 640 ms |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 200 | 506 ms |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 200 | 264 ms |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 200 | 389 ms |
| 4 days ago | Passed | 200 | 289 ms |
| 4 days ago | Passed | 200 | 302 ms |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 200 | 306 ms |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 200 | 418 ms |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 200 | 320 ms |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 200 | 298 ms |