Data Brief
by asistent-crypto.vercel.app in Onchain & crypto
The answer, not the inputs. One call returns a stance for the coin — risk-on, risk-off, fragile or neutral — built from funding and open interest percentiles, sentiment, options implied volatility, the macro regime and what it costs to execute at your size. Every driver comes back with its number and its reading, plus the conditions that would invalidate the call. The rules are deterministic: the same market gives the same verdict.
https://asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/data/brief- Price
- $0.05
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 5.3%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 143 ms
- 189 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Failed
- 4 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Latest check failed 4 h ago: HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
POST https://asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/data/brief
Each call costs $0.05 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/data/brief
content-type: application/json
{
"coin": "BTC"
}Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"data": {},
"ok": true,
"tool": "get_market_brief"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.05.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/data/brief' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"coin":"BTC"}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/data/brief' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"coin":"BTC"}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.05 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.05" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.05 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fasistent-crypto.vercel.app%2Fapi%2Fx402%2Fdata%2Fbrief&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/data/brief", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"coin": "BTC"
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.05 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.05"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://asistent-crypto.vercel.app/api/x402/data/brief",
json={
"coin": "BTC",
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 81 ms | - |
| 9 h ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 105 ms | - |
| 15 h ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 115 ms | - |
| 21 h ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 59 ms | - |
| 27 h ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 90 ms | - |
Show 10 older checks
| 32 h ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 82 ms | - |
| 38 h ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 53 ms | - |
| 43 h ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 98 ms | - |
| 2 days ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 72 ms | - |
| 2 days ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 59 ms | - |
| 2 days ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 105 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 106 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 70 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 125 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | HTTP 402 without a parseable x402 challenge | 402 | 56 ms | - |