Decide Adjacency
by business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev in AI models & inference
Business Frameworks — Approve or refuse an adjacency, applied to the caller's own numbers. Send the four screens and the failure-pattern checks for a candidate move; get approve or refuse, with the failing screens named. Deterministic (the node's rule, no model); returns the worked decision plus the node text and its public citations. Schema at GET /apply/growth/decide/adjacency.
https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/growth/decide/adjacency- Price
- $0.05
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 733 ms
- 1.5 s slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 4 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
How to call it
POST https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/growth/decide/adjacency
Each call costs $0.05 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/growth/decide/adjacency
content-type: application/json
{
"can_be_top_three": true,
"core_not_at_risk": true,
"failure_patterns": {
"entrenched_incumbent": false,
"overestimated_profit_pool": true
},
"move": "add installation services for existing customers",
"only_move_under_way": true,
"reuses_core": true,
"stop_condition_written": false
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
can_be_top_three | boolean | Yes | the company can plausibly be one of the top three in the new segment |
core_not_at_risk | boolean | Yes | |
failure_patterns | object | No | true where the pattern applies to this move |
move | string | No | the candidate move, in a phrase |
only_move_under_way | boolean | Yes | |
reuses_core | boolean | Yes | reuses core customers, channels or capabilities |
stop_condition_written | boolean | No |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"applied": {
"action": [
"<what to do first>"
],
"basis": [
"<where the node ends and the arithmetic begins>"
],
"check": "<when to re-run>",
"figures": "<the computed figures>",
"verdict": "<the decision, worked for these inputs>"
},
"handle": "business-frameworks/growth/decide/[email protected]",
"node": {
"cites": [
"Zook, C. and Allen, J., \"Growth Outside the Core\", Harvard Business Review, December 2003; Zook, C. and Allen, J., Profit from the Core, Harvard Business Press, 2010, ch. 3; Porter, M., \"From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy\", Harvard Business Review, May 1987."
],
"text": "<the node text>"
}
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.05.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/growth/decide/adjacency' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"can_be_top_three":true,"core_not_at_risk":true,"failure_patterns":{"entrenched_incumbent":false,"overestimated_profit_pool":true},"move":"add installation services for existing customers","only_move_under_way":true,"reuses_core":true,"stop_condition_written":false}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/growth/decide/adjacency' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"can_be_top_three":true,"core_not_at_risk":true,"failure_patterns":{"entrenched_incumbent":false,"overestimated_profit_pool":true},"move":"add installation services for existing customers","only_move_under_way":true,"reuses_core":true,"stop_condition_written":false}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.05 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.05" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.05 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbusiness-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev%2Fapply%2Fgrowth%2Fdecide%2Fadjacency&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/growth/decide/adjacency", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"can_be_top_three": true,
"core_not_at_risk": true,
"failure_patterns": {
"entrenched_incumbent": false,
"overestimated_profit_pool": true
},
"move": "add installation services for existing customers",
"only_move_under_way": true,
"reuses_core": true,
"stop_condition_written": false
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.05 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.05"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://business-frameworks.matryoshka-paradigms.workers.dev/apply/growth/decide/adjacency",
json={
"can_be_top_three": True,
"core_not_at_risk": True,
"failure_patterns": {
"entrenched_incumbent": False,
"overestimated_profit_pool": True,
},
"move": "add installation services for existing customers",
"only_move_under_way": True,
"reuses_core": True,
"stop_condition_written": False,
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 57 ms | $0.05 |
| 8 h ago | Passed | 402 | 81 ms | $0.05 |
| 12 h ago | Passed | 402 | 808 ms | $0.05 |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 402 | 158 ms | $0.05 |
| 21 h ago | Passed | 402 | 770 ms | $0.05 |
Show 10 older checks
| 25 h ago | Passed | 402 | 56 ms | $0.05 |
| 29 h ago | Passed | 402 | 56 ms | $0.05 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 842 ms | $0.05 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 46 ms | $0.05 |
| 41 h ago | Passed | 402 | 584 ms | $0.05 |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 402 | 638 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 4.8 s | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 917 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 1.5 s | $0.05 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 802 ms | $0.05 |