Decision Memo Execute

Last 30 days

Uptime

100%

Response time

733 ms typical, 1.1 s slowest 5%

Last check

2 h ago

Next check

any minute now

How to call it

# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -g -i -X POST 'https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/decision_memo/execute' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Compare supplied options using stated criteria, tradeoffs, unknowns, and a reasoned recommendation. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}'

import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Fdecision_memo%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/decision_memo/execute", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: "{\"audience\":\"Business operations manager\",\"brief\":\"Compare supplied options using stated criteria, tradeoffs, unknowns, and a reasoned recommendation. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.\",\"source_text\":\"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown.\"}",
});
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "audience": "Business operations manager",
  "brief": "Compare supplied options using stated criteria, tradeoffs, unknowns, and a reasoned recommendation. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
  "source_text": "Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."
}

Example output

{
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Comparative Analysis of Vendor Proposals for Scheduling Improvement Project\n\n### Background\nExample Door Company seeks to improve its residential entry door installation scheduling over six weeks. The company currently operates with a two-person crew and offers consultations on weekdays.\n\n### Vendor Proposals\n- **Vendor A:** Offers a process assessment priced at $500.\n- **Vendor B:** Offers a process assessment plus a staff workshop priced at $800.\n\n### Evaluation Criteria\n1. **Implementation",
  "assumptions": [
    "The prices quoted are fictional and not market-verified.",
    "Both vendors' assessments cover the scheduling process but differ in scope and depth."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    "Current booking volume and specific scheduling challenges faced by Example Door Company.",
    "Customer feedback related to scheduling satisfaction or issues."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "external_research_performed": false,
    "generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:41:49.606Z",
    "source": "buyer_supplied"
  },
  "request_id": "example_decision_memo",
  "requires_human_review": true,
  "summary": "The analysis compares two vendor proposals for improving scheduling at Example Door Company based on implementation effort, scope clarity, and staff training. Vendor A offers a lower-cost assessment o",
  "task": "decision_memo"
}

Security scan

• No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks