Depth Of Field
by Photography Calculators in Other
Depth of field from focal length, aperture, distance and sensor: near and far limits, total depth and hyperfocal distance.
https://photo-calc.x402tookit.com/depth-of-field- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 60.0%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 520 ms
- 600 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 37 min ago, next in 5 h
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://photo-calc.x402tookit.com/depth-of-field
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://photo-calc.x402tookit.com/depth-of-field?aperture=8&cocMm=0.03&distanceM=3&focalMm=50&sensor=full-frameParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
aperture | number | Yes | f-number |
cocMm | number | No | Circle of confusion in mm (default sensor diagonal / 1500) |
distanceM | number | Yes | Focus distance in metres |
focalMm | number | Yes | Actual focal length in mm |
sensor | string | No | full-frame (default), aps-c, aps-c-canon, aps-h, micro-four-thirds, 1-inch or medium-format-44x33 |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 30 lines
{
"aperture": 8,
"asOf": "2026-10-11T08:40:14.251Z",
"behindSubjectM": 1.18527,
"cocMm": 0.03,
"degraded": false,
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"farLimitIsInfinity": false,
"farLimitM": 4.18527,
"focalMm": 50,
"focusDistanceM": 3,
"hyperfocalM": 10.4667,
"inFrontOfSubjectM": 0.662095,
"nearAtHyperfocalM": 5.23333,
"nearLimitM": 2.33791,
"notChecked": [
"diffraction softening at small apertures (it limits sharpness before the geometric depth of field does)",
"the viewing size and distance assumed by the circle of confusion",
"…1 more"
],
"reasons": [
"Focus at the hyperfocal distance (10.47 m) to keep everything from 5.23 m to infinity sharp.",
"Circle of confusion 0.03 mm; a smaller value (stricter sharpness) shrinks the depth of field."
],
"sensor": "full-frame",
"source": "computed locally",
"summary": "50 mm at f/8, focused at 3 m on full frame: sharp from 2.338 m to 4.185 m (1.85 m deep); hyperfocal 10.47 m.",
"totalDepthM": 1.84736,
"verdict": "COMPUTED"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://photo-calc.x402tookit.com/depth-of-field?aperture=8&cocMm=0.03&distanceM=3&focalMm=50&sensor=full-frame'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://photo-calc.x402tookit.com/depth-of-field?aperture=8&cocMm=0.03&distanceM=3&focalMm=50&sensor=full-frame' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphoto-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fdepth-of-field
const res = await pay("https://photo-calc.x402tookit.com/depth-of-field?aperture=8&cocMm=0.03&distanceM=3&focalMm=50&sensor=full-frame");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://photo-calc.x402tookit.com/depth-of-field?aperture=8&cocMm=0.03&distanceM=3&focalMm=50&sensor=full-frame")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 min ago | Passed | 402 | 540 ms | $0.02 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 540 ms | $0.02 |
| 47 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 103 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 88 ms | - |
| 4 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 79 ms | - |
Show 10 older checks
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 98 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 204 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 173 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 498 ms | $0.02 |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 600 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 512 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 520 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 534 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 183 ms | $0.02 |
| 7 days ago | Passed | 402 | 183 ms | $0.02 |