75trust / 100

Diav Validate

by agentpaystore.com in Markets & finance

x402 APIPassing, checked 4 h ago

Validates flash-loan size and leverage against live Uniswap V3 pool state on Base, under liquidity-drain and slippage stress. Machine clients pay $0.05 USDC (x402, Base L2) per validation. Humans: https://agentpaystore.com/diav/

POST
https://agentpaystore.com/diav/api/validate
Price
$0.05
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
464 ms
763 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
4 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

POST https://agentpaystore.com/diav/api/validate

Each call costs $0.05 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

The listing has no example input.

POST https://agentpaystore.com/diav/api/validate
content-type: application/json

{}

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

{
  "adaptive_params": {
    "fee_multiplier": 1,
    "max_leverage": 10
  },
  "est_slippage_pct": {
    "baseline": 0.09,
    "slippage_spike_3x": 0.27
  },
  "max_safe_amount": 70,
  "pool_state": {
    "liquidity": "0",
    "sqrt_price": 0,
    "tick": 0
  },
  "rationale": "Worst stress stays under 2%. Screening model, not a quote.",
  "verdict": "APPROVE"
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.05.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://agentpaystore.com/diav/api/validate' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{}'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://agentpaystore.com/diav/api/validate' \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  --data-raw '{}' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.05 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.05" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.05 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fagentpaystore.com%2Fdiav%2Fapi%2Fvalidate&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://agentpaystore.com/diav/api/validate", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.05 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.05"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.post(
        "https://agentpaystore.com/diav/api/validate",
        json={},
    )
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
4 h agoPassed402540 ms$0.05
9 h agoPassed402423 ms$0.05
14 h agoPassed402508 ms$0.05
18 h agoPassed402426 ms$0.05
23 h agoPassed402478 ms$0.05
Show 10 older checks
27 h agoPassed402426 ms$0.05
32 h agoPassed402643 ms$0.05
36 h agoPassed402532 ms$0.05
40 h agoPassed402763 ms$0.05
44 h agoPassed402455 ms$0.05
2 days agoPassed402806 ms$0.05
2 days agoPassed402558 ms$0.05
2 days agoPassed402600 ms$0.05
3 days agoPassed402417 ms$0.05
3 days agoPassed402512 ms$0.05