Dnssec Validate
by NetIntel in Developer tools
Validate a domain's DNSSEC configuration over DNS-over-HTTPS: DS records at the parent zone, DNSKEY records at the domain, RRSIG signatures, NSEC/NSEC3, plus the validating resolver's AD bit — returns a full chain-of-trust assessment and readiness score so agents can verify DNS integrity before trusting resolution results.
https://netintel.dev/dnssec/validate- Price
- $0.03
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 323 ms
- 575 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 4 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://netintel.dev/dnssec/validate
Each call costs $0.03 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://netintel.dev/dnssec/validate?domain=example.comParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
domain | string | Yes | Domain name to validate DNSSEC for (e.g. example.com) |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 37 lines
{
"chain_of_trust": "complete",
"components": {
"dnskey_record": {
"count": 4,
"key_types": [
"ZSK",
"KSK",
"ZSK",
"ZSK"
],
"present": true
},
"ds_record": {
"algorithms": [
"ECDSAP256SHA256"
],
"count": 1,
"present": true
},
"nsec_or_nsec3": {
"present": true,
"type": "NSEC"
},
"rrsig_record": {
"present": true,
"signatures_found": 1
}
},
"dnssec_enabled": true,
"domain": "example.com",
"findings": [],
"grade": "A",
"resolver_validated": true,
"score": 100,
"tld_ds_present": true
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.03.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://netintel.dev/dnssec/validate?domain=example.com'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://netintel.dev/dnssec/validate?domain=example.com' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.03 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.03" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.03 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnetintel.dev%2Fdnssec%2Fvalidate
const res = await pay("https://netintel.dev/dnssec/validate?domain=example.com");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.03 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.03"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://netintel.dev/dnssec/validate?domain=example.com")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 467 ms | $0.03 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 360 ms | $0.03 |
| 13 h ago | Passed | 402 | 396 ms | $0.03 |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 402 | 337 ms | $0.03 |
| 21 h ago | Passed | 402 | 298 ms | $0.03 |
Show 10 older checks
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 323 ms | $0.03 |
| 30 h ago | Passed | 402 | 418 ms | $0.03 |
| 34 h ago | Passed | 402 | 291 ms | $0.03 |
| 38 h ago | Passed | 402 | 605 ms | $0.03 |
| 43 h ago | Passed | 402 | 351 ms | $0.03 |
| 47 h ago | Passed | 402 | 364 ms | $0.03 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 355 ms | $0.03 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 293 ms | $0.03 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 439 ms | $0.03 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 181 ms | $0.03 |