Domain Due Diligence
by NetIntel in Developer tools
One call combines domain availability, heuristic value appraisal, and TLD pricing into a single acquisition brief — tells an agent whether a name is available, what it's worth, and what it costs across TLDs, concurrently and with graceful partial-failure handling.
https://netintel.dev/domain-due-diligence- Price
- $0.2
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 287 ms
- 359 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 4 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://netintel.dev/domain-due-diligence
Each call costs $0.2 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://netintel.dev/domain-due-diligence?domain=acme.comParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
domain | string | Yes | Domain to assess, including TLD (e.g. acme.com) |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 43 lines
{
"domain": "acme.com",
"findings": [
{
"deduction": -20,
"detail": "acme.com is already registered",
"rule": "not_available"
}
],
"generated_at": "2026-06-16T01:00:00Z",
"grade": "B",
"name": "acme",
"score": 80,
"sections": {
"appraisal": {
"available": true,
"value_score": 95,
"value_tier": "premium"
},
"availability": {
"available": true,
"expires_at": "2025-06-01T00:00:00Z",
"is_available": false,
"registrar": "GoDaddy LLC",
"status": "registered"
},
"tld_pricing": {
"available": true,
"cheapest": {
"domain": "acme.xyz",
"register": 1.99
},
"cheapest_premium": {
"domain": "acme.com",
"register": 10.99
}
}
},
"sections_failed": 0,
"sections_ok": 3,
"tld": "com",
"verdict": "taken_premium"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.2.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://netintel.dev/domain-due-diligence?domain=acme.com'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://netintel.dev/domain-due-diligence?domain=acme.com' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.2 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.2" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.2 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnetintel.dev%2Fdomain-due-diligence
const res = await pay("https://netintel.dev/domain-due-diligence?domain=acme.com");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.2 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.2"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://netintel.dev/domain-due-diligence?domain=acme.com")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 198 ms | $0.2 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 411 ms | $0.2 |
| 13 h ago | Passed | 402 | 341 ms | $0.2 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 180 ms | $0.2 |
| 21 h ago | Passed | 402 | 307 ms | $0.2 |
Show 10 older checks
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 287 ms | $0.2 |
| 30 h ago | Passed | 402 | 327 ms | $0.2 |
| 34 h ago | Passed | 402 | 300 ms | $0.2 |
| 39 h ago | Passed | 402 | 346 ms | $0.2 |
| 43 h ago | Passed | 402 | 339 ms | $0.2 |
| 47 h ago | Passed | 402 | 354 ms | $0.2 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 324 ms | $0.2 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 250 ms | $0.2 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 255 ms | $0.2 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 185 ms | $0.2 |