Email Batch
by prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev in Company & people data
Batch email lookup: 1-25 contacts in one call, same result shape and labels as /v1/email, results in input order plus summary counts. x402 upto: you authorize up to $0.08 x unique contacts and are charged $0.08 only per address returned. Duplicates are looked up once. This request: 2 unique contact(s), maximum $0.16.
https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/v1/email/batch- Price
- $0.16
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 390 ms
- 628 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 2 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
POST https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/v1/email/batch
Each call costs $0.16 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/v1/email/batch
content-type: application/json
{
"contacts": [
{
"domain": "acme.com",
"first_name": "Jane",
"last_name": "Doe"
},
{
"domain": "globex.com",
"full_name": "Sam Lee"
}
]
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
contacts | array of object | Yes | |
found_only | boolean | No |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 37 lines
{
"billing": {
"charged_usd": 0.08,
"max_authorized_usd": 0.16
},
"results": [
{
"email": "[email protected]",
"index": 0,
"outcome": "found",
"recommendation": {
"action": "send"
}
},
{
"email": null,
"index": 1,
"outcome": "no_result",
"recommendation": {
"action": "do_not_send"
}
}
],
"schema_version": "2.0",
"summary": {
"do_not_send": 0,
"errors": 0,
"found": 1,
"no_result": 1,
"requested": 2,
"send": 1,
"send_with_caution": 0,
"unique": 2,
"verify_first": 0
},
"tool": "email_lookup_batch"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.16.
The code pays $0.16 in USDC on Base instead: it uses a payment scheme other than exact, which needs a different client setup.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/v1/email/batch' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"contacts":[{"domain":"acme.com","first_name":"Jane","last_name":"Doe"},{"domain":"globex.com","full_name":"Sam Lee"}]}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/v1/email/batch' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"contacts":[{"domain":"acme.com","first_name":"Jane","last_name":"Doe"},{"domain":"globex.com","full_name":"Sam Lee"}]}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.16 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.16" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.16 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fprospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev%2Fv1%2Femail%2Fbatch&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/v1/email/batch", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"contacts": [
{
"domain": "acme.com",
"first_name": "Jane",
"last_name": "Doe"
},
{
"domain": "globex.com",
"full_name": "Sam Lee"
}
]
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.16 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.16"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://prospect-intelligence.prospectintel.workers.dev/v1/email/batch",
json={
"contacts": [
{
"domain": "acme.com",
"first_name": "Jane",
"last_name": "Doe",
},
{
"domain": "globex.com",
"full_name": "Sam Lee",
},
],
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 367 ms | $0.16 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 383 ms | $0.16 |
| 11 h ago | Passed | 402 | 460 ms | $0.16 |
| 16 h ago | Passed | 402 | 399 ms | $0.16 |
| 21 h ago | Passed | 402 | 315 ms | $0.16 |
Show 10 older checks
| 25 h ago | Passed | 402 | 556 ms | $0.16 |
| 29 h ago | Passed | 402 | 628 ms | $0.16 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 367 ms | $0.16 |
| 38 h ago | Passed | 402 | 535 ms | $0.16 |
| 42 h ago | Passed | 402 | 360 ms | $0.16 |
| 46 h ago | Passed | 402 | 559 ms | $0.16 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 386 ms | $0.16 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 344 ms | $0.16 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 470 ms | $0.16 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 390 ms | $0.16 |