Erc20 Aprobaciones Pago
by Vextorium in Onchain & crypto
Which contracts a wallet has allowed to move its ERC-20 tokens: checks the chain's main tokens (or the ones you pass) over recent blocks plus common spenders (Uniswap routers, Permit2), returning the live allowance and flagging unlimited ones. Find and revoke what you don't use. Usually 2-10 s. Not available on Arbitrum (its public nodes keep no log history); on some chains the public node limits how far back it can search (reported in the result).
https://api.vextorium.com/erc20-aprobaciones-pago- Price
- $0.005
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 0.0%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- -
- no timed checks yet
- Last check
- Failed
- 3 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Latest check failed 3 h ago: Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units
How to call it
POST https://api.vextorium.com/erc20-aprobaciones-pago
Each call costs $0.005 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://api.vextorium.com/erc20-aprobaciones-pago
content-type: application/json
{
"red": "base",
"wallet": "0x9b9B3F22BEBD1e3E528C2759a2ca34cD2e0184A1"
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
bloques | integer | No | |
red | string | No | Chain (default base) One of: base, ethereum, arbitrum, optimism, polygon, bnb, avalanche, gnosis, linea, scroll, sonic, unichain. |
tokens | array of string | No | |
wallet | string | Yes |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"aprobaciones": [],
"aprobaciones_vigentes": 0,
"bloques_revisados": 50000,
"ilimitadas": 0,
"nota": "Revisa los tokens indicados (o los principales de la red) y los gastadores habituales; para revocar usa revocar-aprobacion.",
"red": "base",
"tokens_revisados": 5,
"wallet": "0x9b9B3F22BEBD1e3E528C2759a2ca34cD2e0184A1"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.005.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://api.vextorium.com/erc20-aprobaciones-pago' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"red":"base","wallet":"0x9b9B3F22BEBD1e3E528C2759a2ca34cD2e0184A1"}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://api.vextorium.com/erc20-aprobaciones-pago' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"red":"base","wallet":"0x9b9B3F22BEBD1e3E528C2759a2ca34cD2e0184A1"}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.005 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.005" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.005 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.vextorium.com%2Ferc20-aprobaciones-pago&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://api.vextorium.com/erc20-aprobaciones-pago", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"red": "base",
"wallet": "0x9b9B3F22BEBD1e3E528C2759a2ca34cD2e0184A1"
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.005 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.005"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://api.vextorium.com/erc20-aprobaciones-pago",
json={
"red": "base",
"wallet": "0x9b9B3F22BEBD1e3E528C2759a2ca34cD2e0184A1",
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 228 ms | $0.005 |
| 7 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 120 ms | $0.005 |
| 12 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 106 ms | $0.005 |
| 17 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 160 ms | $0.005 |
| 21 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 178 ms | $0.005 |
Show 10 older checks
| 26 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 77 ms | $0.005 |
| 30 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 79 ms | $0.005 |
| 34 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 244 ms | $0.005 |
| 39 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 89 ms | $0.005 |
| 43 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 82 ms | $0.005 |
| 47 h ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 76 ms | $0.005 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 74 ms | $0.005 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 73 ms | $0.005 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 75 ms | $0.005 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.005" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 85 ms | $0.005 |