81trust / 100

Eu Mica Check

by api.x-402.online in Onchain & crypto

x402 APIPassing, checked 2 h ago

Is this crypto firm authorised under MiCA in the EU? One call checks the official ESMA register of crypto-asset service providers (CASP) by company name or LEI: authorised or not, home me…

GET https://api.x-402.online/v1/eu/mica-check

Last 30 days

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked
Uptime
100%
Response time
141 ms typical, 141 ms slowest 5%
Last check
2 h ago
Next check
any minute now

How to call it

# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X GET "https://api.x-402.online/v1/eu/mica-check?name=Bitpanda"
import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.x-402.online%2Fv1%2Feu%2Fmica-check
const res = await pay("https://api.x-402.online/v1/eu/mica-check?name=Bitpanda");
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "name": "Bitpanda"
}

Example output

{
  "authorised": true,
  "matches": [
    {
      "authorised_on": "09/04/2025",
      "competent_authority": "Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA)",
      "home_member_state": "AT",
      "legal_name": "Bitpanda GmbH",
      "services": [
        "a. providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "verdict": "AUTHORISED_CASP_UNDER_MICA"
}

Security scan

  • No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
2 h agoPassed402151 ms$0.01
7 h agoPassed402141 ms$0.01