81trust / 100
Eu Mica Check
by api.x-402.online in Onchain & crypto
x402 APIPassing, checked 2 h ago
Is this crypto firm authorised under MiCA in the EU? One call checks the official ESMA register of crypto-asset service providers (CASP) by company name or LEI: authorised or not, home me…
GET https://api.x-402.online/v1/eu/mica-check
Last 30 days
All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked
- Uptime
- 100%
- Response time
- 141 ms typical, 141 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- 2 h ago
- Next check
- any minute now
How to call it
# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X GET "https://api.x-402.online/v1/eu/mica-check?name=Bitpanda"import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
const client = new x402Client().register(
"eip155:8453",
new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.x-402.online%2Fv1%2Feu%2Fmica-check
const res = await pay("https://api.x-402.online/v1/eu/mica-check?name=Bitpanda");
console.log(await res.json());Example input
{
"name": "Bitpanda"
}Example output
{
"authorised": true,
"matches": [
{
"authorised_on": "09/04/2025",
"competent_authority": "Austrian Financial Market Authority (FMA)",
"home_member_state": "AT",
"legal_name": "Bitpanda GmbH",
"services": [
"a. providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients"
]
}
],
"verdict": "AUTHORISED_CASP_UNDER_MICA"
}Security scan
- No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 151 ms | $0.01 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 141 ms | $0.01 |