Executive Brief Execute

Last 30 days

Uptime

100%

Response time

785 ms typical, 1.3 s slowest 5%

Last check

1 h ago

Next check

any minute now

How to call it

# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X POST "https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/executive_brief/execute" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Condense supplied material into decision-relevant findings, evidence, risks, and required actions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}'

import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Fexecutive_brief%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/executive_brief/execute", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Condense supplied material into decision-relevant findings, evidence, risks, and required actions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}),
});
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "audience": "Business operations manager",
  "brief": "Condense supplied material into decision-relevant findings, evidence, risks, and required actions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
  "source_text": "Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."
}

Example output

{
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n## Decision-Relevant Findings\n\n- Example Door Company currently installs residential entry doors in Dallas using a two-person crew.\n- Consultations are conducted on weekdays.\n- The project aims to improve scheduling over a six-week period.\n- Vendor A offers a process assessment for $500.\n- Vendor B offers a process assessment plus a staff workshop for $800.\n- Evaluation criteria include implementation effort, scope clarity, and staff training.\n\n## Evidence\n\n- Pricing proposals: Vendor A ($500), ",
  "assumptions": [
    "Pricing figures are fictional and not market-validated.",
    "Scheduling improvement is the primary project goal."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    "Current booking volume and scheduling performance metrics.",
    "Customer feedback related to scheduling."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "external_research_performed": false,
    "generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:41:54.388Z",
    "source": "buyer_supplied"
  },
  "request_id": "example_executive_brief",
  "requires_human_review": true,
  "summary": "Example Door Company aims to improve scheduling over six weeks and has two vendor proposals differing in scope and price. However, critical data such as current booking volume, customer feedback, vend",
  "task": "executive_brief"
}

Security scan

• No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks