Fence Calc
by Construction Calculators in Other
Posts, rails and pickets for a straight fence from its length, post spacing, picket width and gap.
https://construction-calc.x402tookit.com/fence-calc- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 70.6%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 515 ms
- 581 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 9 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://construction-calc.x402tookit.com/fence-calc
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://construction-calc.x402tookit.com/fence-calc?heightFt=6&lengthFt=100&picketGapIn=0.5&picketWidthIn=5.5&postSpacingFt=8Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
gates | integer | No | Gates, each takes 4 ft of fence length and 1 extra post, default 0 |
heightFt | number | No | Fence height in feet, default 6 |
lengthFt | number | Yes | Total fence length in feet |
picketGapIn | number | No | Gap between pickets in inches, default 0.5 (0 for privacy) |
picketWidthIn | number | No | Actual picket width in inches, default 5.5 |
postSpacingFt | number | No | Post spacing in feet, default 8 |
wastePct | number | No | Picket waste, default 5 |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 28 lines
{
"asOf": "2026-10-11T14:25:13.159Z",
"degraded": false,
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"fenceRunFt": 100,
"gates": 0,
"heightFt": 6,
"notChecked": [
"corners, ends and gate posts beyond the simple count (line, corner and end posts are not separated)",
"post depth, concrete, hardware and local height or setback rules",
"…2 more"
],
"pickets": 200,
"picketsWithWaste": 210,
"postSpacingFt": 8,
"posts": 14,
"railLinearFt": 312,
"rails": 39,
"reasons": [
"Posts = sections + 1, plus one extra per gate (gates take 4 ft of the length).",
"Three rails per section, by height.",
"…1 more"
],
"sections": 13,
"source": "computed locally",
"summary": "13 sections: 14 posts, 39 rails and 210 pickets (200 + 5% waste) for 100 ft at 6 ft high.",
"verdict": "ESTIMATE"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://construction-calc.x402tookit.com/fence-calc?heightFt=6&lengthFt=100&picketGapIn=0.5&picketWidthIn=5.5&postSpacingFt=8'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://construction-calc.x402tookit.com/fence-calc?heightFt=6&lengthFt=100&picketGapIn=0.5&picketWidthIn=5.5&postSpacingFt=8' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fconstruction-calc.x402tookit.com%2Ffence-calc
const res = await pay("https://construction-calc.x402tookit.com/fence-calc?heightFt=6&lengthFt=100&picketGapIn=0.5&picketWidthIn=5.5&postSpacingFt=8");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://construction-calc.x402tookit.com/fence-calc?heightFt=6&lengthFt=100&picketGapIn=0.5&picketWidthIn=5.5&postSpacingFt=8")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 517 ms | $0.02 |
| 22 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 109 ms | - |
| 35 h ago | Passed | 402 | 515 ms | $0.02 |
| 47 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 123 ms | - |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 576 ms | $0.02 |
Show 10 older checks
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 568 ms | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 524 ms | $0.02 |
| 4 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 108 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 182 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 216 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 510 ms | $0.02 |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 504 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 581 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 527 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 488 ms | $0.02 |