Fetch Btc Dca Indicator
by RC Quantum Data Oracle in Search & web
How hard to lean into a BTC DCA budget now: a 0-9 accumulation score plus LIGHT/BASE/ACCELERATE/AGGRESSIVE state and intensity multiplier, from trend, momentum and mean-reversion. Ed25519-signed. Not advice.
https://data.rcqsignals.com/v1/fetch/btc-dca-indicator- Price
- $0.05
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 445 ms
- 771 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 4 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://data.rcqsignals.com/v1/fetch/btc-dca-indicator
Each call costs $0.05 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://data.rcqsignals.com/v1/fetch/btc-dca-indicatorExample response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 67 lines
{
"as_of": "2026-08-28T00:00:00Z",
"asset": "BTC-USD",
"collected_at": "2026-08-29T09:00:00.000Z",
"data_quality": {
"closed_bars_used": 1199,
"scored_bar": "2026-08-28",
"scored_bar_age_days": 1,
"source": "Coinbase BTC-USD daily candles",
"stale": false,
"status": "GOOD"
},
"dca_score": 6,
"dca_state": "ACCELERATE",
"disclaimer": "Systematic Bitcoin accumulation context. Not individualized investment advice.",
"evidence": {
"classification": "STRONG_HISTORICAL_ACCUMULATION_EDGE",
"forward_validation_active": true,
"historical_30d_rank_ic": 0.2545,
"historical_cost_basis_advantage_pct": 3.1535,
"historical_equal_capital_btc_advantage_pct": 3.2561,
"historical_positive_blocks": "4/4",
"significance_note": "Family-wise block-permutation p-values did not reach significance, so this is a historical accumulation edge under forward validation, not proven predictive alpha."
},
"intensity_multiplier": 1.5,
"methodology": {
"indicator_version": "v1",
"score_version": "v1",
"timescale": "daily"
},
"oracle": "rcq.btc.dca_indicator.v1",
"price_usd": 90847.54,
"product": "RCQ BTC DCA Indicator",
"provenance": {
"alg": "ed25519",
"public_key": "4bc079775b77a6498b91185f9e5fded294a58463a07c96b74a8c27b9b3f8879d"
},
"regime": {
"trend": "UPTREND",
"volatility": "LOW"
},
"score_drivers": [
{
"active": true,
"name": "rsi_below_buy"
},
{
"active": true,
"name": "price_below_ema20"
},
{
"active": true,
"name": "recent_stabilization"
}
],
"score_max": 9,
"signals": {
"ema20": 91004.12,
"ema200": 87466.74,
"ema50": 89402.3,
"macd_histogram": -111.09,
"recent_stabilization": true,
"rsi14": 38.42,
"z_score": -1.21
},
"version": "v1.0"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.05.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://data.rcqsignals.com/v1/fetch/btc-dca-indicator'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://data.rcqsignals.com/v1/fetch/btc-dca-indicator' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.05 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.05" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.05 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata.rcqsignals.com%2Fv1%2Ffetch%2Fbtc-dca-indicator
const res = await pay("https://data.rcqsignals.com/v1/fetch/btc-dca-indicator");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.05 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.05"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://data.rcqsignals.com/v1/fetch/btc-dca-indicator")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 482 ms | $0.05 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 292 ms | $0.05 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 340 ms | $0.05 |
| 19 h ago | Passed | 402 | 439 ms | $0.05 |
| 24 h ago | Passed | 402 | 384 ms | $0.05 |
Show 10 older checks
| 28 h ago | Passed | 402 | 511 ms | $0.05 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 340 ms | $0.05 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 550 ms | $0.05 |
| 42 h ago | Passed | 402 | 450 ms | $0.05 |
| 46 h ago | Passed | 402 | 433 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 488 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 532 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 310 ms | $0.05 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 374 ms | $0.05 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 771 ms | $0.05 |