13trust / 100

Geopolitical Supply Chain Risk

by GeopoliticalPulse in Security & trust

x402 APIFailing, checked 5 h ago

Geopolitical supply-chain risk for supply-chain, sourcing, and risk agents. Maps concentration, chokepoints, sanctions exposure, and reshoring options for any sector or commodity, from chips to critical minerals.

GET
https://geopoliticalpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/geopolitical/supply-chain-risk
Price
$0.2
per call in USDC
Uptime
0.0%
last 30 days
Response time
-
no timed checks yet
Last check
Failed
5 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Latest check failed 5 h ago: Amount "0.2" is not in atomic token units

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

GET https://geopoliticalpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/geopolitical/supply-chain-risk

Each call costs $0.2 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://geopoliticalpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/geopolitical/supply-chain-risk

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
langstringNoResponse language (ISO 639-1) | en | es | fr | de | zh | ja | ko | pt
sectorstringNoSector or commodity to analyze | semiconductors | rare earths | lithium | pharmaceuticals | energy | food | shipping | defense

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

Example response, 32 lines
{
  "analyst_assessment": "The semiconductor supply chain represents the most geopolitically contested industrial sector...",
  "critical_dependencies": [
    {
      "concentration_country": "Taiwan",
      "geopolitical_risk_level": "CRITICAL",
      "input_or_component": "TSMC advanced node wafers",
      "market_share": "90%"
    },
    {
      "concentration_country": "Netherlands/EU",
      "geopolitical_risk_level": "MODERATE",
      "input_or_component": "ASML EUV lithography",
      "market_share": "100%"
    }
  ],
  "decoupling_assessment": {
    "beneficiary_countries": [
      "US",
      "India",
      "Japan",
      "EU"
    ],
    "momentum": "ACCELERATING"
  },
  "maritime_chokepoints": [
    "Taiwan Strait",
    "Strait of Malacca"
  ],
  "overall_risk_level": "CRITICAL",
  "sector": "semiconductors"
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.2.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://geopoliticalpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/geopolitical/supply-chain-risk'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://geopoliticalpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/geopolitical/supply-chain-risk' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.2 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.2" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.2 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgeopoliticalpulse.theaslangroupllc.com%2Fapi%2Fgeopolitical%2Fsupply-chain-risk
const res = await pay("https://geopoliticalpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/geopolitical/supply-chain-risk");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.2 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.2"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://geopoliticalpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/geopolitical/supply-chain-risk")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
5 h agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402245 ms$0.2
10 h agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402194 ms$0.2
16 h agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402198 ms$0.2
22 h agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402208 ms$0.2
28 h agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402161 ms$0.2
Show 7 older checks
33 h agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402937 ms$0.2
39 h agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402190 ms$0.2
44 h agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402202 ms$0.2
2 days agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402201 ms$0.2
2 days agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402247 ms$0.2
2 days agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402195 ms$0.2
3 days agoAmount "0.2" is not in atomic token units402376 ms$0.2