Glow Ingredient Lookup
by GlowPulse in Other
Skincare ingredient checker — what is [INCI ingredient] and is it safe? Function, EU CosIng status, CIR/PubChem safety verdict, comedogenicity rating with concentration caveat, and pregnancy-safety flag, grounded in EU CosIng, CIR, and dermatology literature.
https://glowpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/glow/ingredient-lookup- Price
- $0.05
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 0.0%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- -
- no timed checks yet
- Last check
- Failed
- 7 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Latest check failed 7 h ago: Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://glowpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/glow/ingredient-lookup
Each call costs $0.05 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://glowpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/glow/ingredient-lookupParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
inci_name | string | No | Niacinamide | Retinol | Sodium Hyaluronate (required — INCI ingredient name) |
lang | string | No | en | ko | ja | de | fr | es | pt (optional) |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"cir_safety_verdict": {
"verdict": "safe as used"
},
"comedogenicity": {
"rating_0_5": 0
},
"function": "Active — skin-barrier and brightening agent",
"inci_name": "Niacinamide"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.05.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://glowpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/glow/ingredient-lookup'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://glowpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/glow/ingredient-lookup' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.05 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.05" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.05 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fglowpulse.theaslangroupllc.com%2Fapi%2Fglow%2Fingredient-lookup
const res = await pay("https://glowpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/glow/ingredient-lookup");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.05 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.05"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://glowpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/glow/ingredient-lookup")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 h ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 321 ms | $0.05 |
| 15 h ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 239 ms | $0.05 |
| 23 h ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 237 ms | $0.05 |
| 32 h ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 305 ms | $0.05 |
| 40 h ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 222 ms | $0.05 |
Show 10 older checks
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 290 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 214 ms | $0.05 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 300 ms | $0.05 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 232 ms | $0.05 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 229 ms | $0.05 |
| 4 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 221 ms | $0.05 |
| 4 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 227 ms | $0.05 |
| 4 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 252 ms | $0.05 |
| 4 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 200 ms | $0.05 |
| 5 days ago | Amount "0.05" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 278 ms | $0.05 |