78trust / 100

History

by gibai.app in Markets & finance

x402 APIPassing, checked 1 h ago

Bitcoin and digital-asset adoption scores for the world's 100 largest banks, as CSV. Answers: does a bank offer Bitcoin custody or trading, how has its position changed, which banks lead. One row per scoring change since the index began, each with the bank, the activity (custody, trading, stablecoins, tokenization and 12 more), old and new values, a reason, a source URL, the event date, and the resulting score and rank out of 100. Includes the scoring schema. Free /latest shows coverage.

GET
https://gibai.app/history
Price
$0.1
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
190 ms
315 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
1 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed

How to call it

GET https://gibai.app/history

Each call costs $0.1 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

Built from the input schema. Replace the values with your own.

GET https://gibai.app/history

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

{
  "history_csv": "change_date,ts,bank,country,sub_dimension,old_score,new_score,origin,reason,source_url,published_total,published_rank,event_date\n2026-09-03,2026-09-03T07:34:58Z,Citigroup,United States,btc_custody,75,50,auto,Citi announced Bitcoin custody under Custody+ launching later in 2026; not yet live.,https://coinpaprika.com/news/citi-brings-bitcoin-into-bank-grade-custody/,31.8,15,2026-08-18\n",
  "report_date": "2026-09-03",
  "rows": 1547,
  "schema_json": {
    "score_ladder": {
      "0": "No Bitcoin adoption",
      "25": "Announced, piloted, or offered only through a third party",
      "50": "Launched, but limited in scope or availability",
      "75": "Live at scale",
      "100": "Market-leading"
    }
  }
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.1.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://gibai.app/history'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://gibai.app/history' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.1 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.1" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.1 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgibai.app%2Fhistory
const res = await pay("https://gibai.app/history");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.1 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.1"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://gibai.app/history")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
1 h agoPassed402165 ms$0.1
6 h agoPassed402175 ms$0.1
10 h agoPassed402190 ms$0.1
14 h agoPassed402159 ms$0.1
19 h agoPassed402175 ms$0.1
Show 10 older checks
23 h agoPassed402173 ms$0.1
27 h agoPassed402179 ms$0.1
31 h agoPassed402193 ms$0.1
35 h agoPassed402243 ms$0.1
39 h agoPassed402255 ms$0.1
43 h agoPassed402216 ms$0.1
46 h agoPassed402235 ms$0.1
2 days agoPassed402257 ms$0.1
2 days agoPassed402421 ms$0.1
2 days agoPassed402193 ms$0.1