Intelligence Rug Check
by Rug check for any token in Onchain & crypto
Rug check for any token ($0.01): is this token a rug pull or scam? Short verdict LOW_RISK, CAUTION or HIGH_RISK with a 0-100 safety score, one plain sentence, can it be sold, buy tax, liquidity, owner control and the top three risks, for a contract on Base, Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon or Solana.
https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/rug-check/:address- Price
- $0.01
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 177 ms
- 1.6 s slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 4 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/rug-check/:address
Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
Built from the input schema. Replace the values with your own.
GET https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/rug-check/:address?chain=baseParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
chain | string | No | Chain of the token: base, ethereum, arbitrum, optimism or polygon (token-risk also takes solana). Not the payment network Default: "base". |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"adminFunctions": [
"MINT"
],
"buyTaxPercent": 0,
"canSell": "YES",
"chain": "base",
"fullReport": "/api/v1/intelligence/token-risk/0x940181a94a35a4569e4529a3cdfb74e38fd98631?chain=base",
"liquidityUsd": 41817538.85,
"name": "Aerodrome",
"ownerControl": "NO_OWNER_FOUND",
"positives": [
"A recent buyer's transfer of half their balance into the pool (a sale) succeeds"
],
"risks": [
"Code contains a function by which new supply can be minted; no owner() found"
],
"safetyScore": 90,
"summary": "AERO on Base looks low-risk: a simulated sale succeeds, no buy tax was seen, $41.8M of liquidity backs it.",
"symbol": "AERO",
"token": "0x940181a94a35a4569e4529a3cdfb74e38fd98631",
"upgradeable": false,
"verdict": "LOW_RISK"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/rug-check/:address?chain=base'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/rug-check/:address?chain=base' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.marketintelligenceapi.com%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fintelligence%2Frug-check%2F%3Aaddress
const res = await pay("https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/rug-check/:address?chain=base");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/rug-check/:address?chain=base")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 178 ms | $0.01 |
| 9 h ago | Passed | 402 | 206 ms | $0.01 |
| 13 h ago | Passed | 402 | 217 ms | $0.01 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 158 ms | $0.01 |
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 151 ms | $0.01 |
Show 10 older checks
| 27 h ago | Passed | 402 | 168 ms | $0.01 |
| 31 h ago | Passed | 402 | 177 ms | $0.01 |
| 35 h ago | Passed | 402 | 246 ms | $0.01 |
| 39 h ago | Passed | 402 | 171 ms | $0.01 |
| 43 h ago | Passed | 402 | 158 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 221 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 218 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 561 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 219 ms | $0.01 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 160 ms | $0.01 |
History
| 16 Oct 2026 | Price on Base changed from 9000 units of 0x60a3E35Cc302bFA44Cb288Bc5a4F316Fdb1adb42 to 8900 units of 0x60a3E35Cc302bFA44Cb288Bc5a4F316Fdb1adb42; Price on eip155:480 changed from 9000 units of 0x1C60ba0A0eD1019e8Eb035E6daF4155A5cE2380B to 8900 units of 0x1C60ba0A0eD1019e8Eb035E6daF4155A5cE2380B |