Intelligence Token Verdict
by Token safety check in Onchain & crypto
Token safety check: is this token safe to buy? Send a contract address on Base (default), Ethereum, Arbitrum, Optimism, Polygon or Solana; get a rug check and honeypot verdict - LOW_RISK, CAUTION or HIGH_RISK, a 0-100 safety score, one plain-language sentence, can it be sold (simulated sale), buy tax, liquidity, owner control and the top three risks. Rule-based on-chain checks.
https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/token-verdict/:address- Price
- $0.01
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 165 ms
- 243 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 1 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
How to call it
GET https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/token-verdict/:address
Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
Built from the input schema. Replace the values with your own.
GET https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/token-verdict/:address?chain=baseParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
chain | string | No | Chain the token lives on: base, ethereum, arbitrum, optimism, polygon or solana. Not the payment network: payment networks are in x-payment-info.networks. One of: base, ethereum, arbitrum, optimism, polygon, solana. Default: "base". |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"adminFunctions": [
"MINT"
],
"buyTaxPercent": 0,
"canSell": "YES",
"chain": "base",
"fullReport": "/api/v1/intelligence/token-risk/0x940181a94a35a4569e4529a3cdfb74e38fd98631?chain=base",
"liquidityUsd": 41817538.85,
"name": "Aerodrome",
"ownerControl": "NO_OWNER_FOUND",
"positives": [
"A recent buyer's transfer of half their balance into the pool (a sale) succeeds"
],
"risks": [
"Code contains a function by which new supply can be minted; no owner() found"
],
"safetyScore": 90,
"summary": "AERO on Base looks low-risk: a simulated sale succeeds, no buy tax was seen, $41.8M of liquidity backs it.",
"symbol": "AERO",
"token": "0x940181a94a35a4569e4529a3cdfb74e38fd98631",
"upgradeable": false,
"verdict": "LOW_RISK"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/token-verdict/:address?chain=base'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/token-verdict/:address?chain=base' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.marketintelligenceapi.com%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fintelligence%2Ftoken-verdict%2F%3Aaddress
const res = await pay("https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/token-verdict/:address?chain=base");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://api.marketintelligenceapi.com/api/v1/intelligence/token-verdict/:address?chain=base")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h ago | Passed | 402 | 243 ms | $0.01 |
| 6 h ago | Passed | 402 | 171 ms | $0.01 |
| 10 h ago | Passed | 402 | 59 ms | $0.01 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 49 ms | $0.01 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 186 ms | $0.01 |
Show 10 older checks
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 185 ms | $0.01 |
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 141 ms | $0.01 |
| 30 h ago | Passed | 402 | 165 ms | $0.01 |
| 34 h ago | Passed | 402 | 140 ms | $0.01 |
| 38 h ago | Passed | 402 | 56 ms | $0.01 |
| 42 h ago | Passed | 402 | 196 ms | $0.01 |
| 46 h ago | Passed | 402 | 318 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 190 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 68 ms | $0.01 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 189 ms | $0.01 |