Latency Budget
by Systems Capacity Calculators in Email & messaging
Add up serial stage latencies against a target (share per stage, slack, bottleneck) and compute tail amplification from fan-out.
https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/latency-budget- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 64.3%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 518 ms
- 533 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 4 h ago, next in 2 h
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/latency-budget
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/latency-budget?fanOut=100&stages=dns%3A20%2Ctls%3A40%2Capp%3A120%2Cdb%3A60&targetMs=300Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
fanOut | integer | No | Parallel calls a request waits for (each at its own percentile), 1 to 100000 |
percentile | number | No | Per-call percentile, 50 to 99.9999 (default 99): the chance a single call is within its stated latency |
stages | string | Yes | name:milliseconds pairs, comma separated: dns:20,tls:40,app:120,db:60 |
targetMs | number | No | Total latency target in milliseconds, to compute slack |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 42 lines
{
"asOf": "2026-10-11T20:19:39.450Z",
"bottleneck": "app",
"degraded": false,
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"fanOut": {
"calls": 100,
"note": "to have 99% of requests entirely within the per-call latency, each call must meet its target 99.9900% of the time",
"perCallPercentile": 99,
"perCallPercentileNeededForSameOverall": 99.98995016917583,
"probabilityAtLeastOneCallSlowerThanItsPercentile": 0.6339676587267709,
"requestsHitByTailPercent": 63.3968
},
"notChecked": [
"the distribution of each stage: adding percentiles of stages (p99 + p99) overstates the p99 of the sum, but adding means is exact",
"queueing delay under load (see /queue-model) and retries",
"…1 more"
],
"reasons": [
"Serial stages add; the share column shows where to optimise first.",
"Tail amplification: with N parallel calls the chance that at least one is slower than its p99 is 1 - 0.99^N (63% for N = 100), so the request is as slow as its slowest call."
],
"serialTotalMs": 240,
"slackMs": 60,
"source": "computed locally",
"stages": [
{
"ms": 20,
"sharePercent": 8.33,
"stage": "dns"
},
{
"ms": 40,
"sharePercent": 16.67,
"stage": "tls"
}
],
"summary": "Serial total 240 ms; biggest stage app (50%). Within the 300 ms target with 60 ms to spare. Fan-out 100 calls at p99: 63.4% of requests see at least one slow call.",
"targetMs": 300,
"targetUsedPercent": 80,
"verdict": "WITHIN_TARGET"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/latency-budget?fanOut=100&stages=dns%3A20%2Ctls%3A40%2Capp%3A120%2Cdb%3A60&targetMs=300'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/latency-budget?fanOut=100&stages=dns%3A20%2Ctls%3A40%2Capp%3A120%2Cdb%3A60&targetMs=300' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdata-calc.x402tookit.com%2Flatency-budget
const res = await pay("https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/latency-budget?fanOut=100&stages=dns%3A20%2Ctls%3A40%2Capp%3A120%2Cdb%3A60&targetMs=300");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://data-calc.x402tookit.com/latency-budget?fanOut=100&stages=dns%3A20%2Ctls%3A40%2Capp%3A120%2Cdb%3A60&targetMs=300")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 h ago | Passed | 402 | 518 ms | $0.02 |
| 16 h ago | Passed | 402 | 533 ms | $0.02 |
| 2 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 154 ms | - |
| 3 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 100 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 96 ms | - |
Show 9 older checks
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 261 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 222 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 513 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 527 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 527 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 532 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 489 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 496 ms | $0.02 |
| 7 days ago | Passed | 402 | 445 ms | $0.02 |