75trust / 100

Licitacoes Fornecedor

by Brazilayer Public Contracts in Onchain & crypto

x402 APIPassing, checked 4 h ago

Every public contract won by a Brazilian company, from the official National Public Procurement Portal (PNCP): contracting government body, object, value, signature date and validity period, plus summary stats (total contracts, total value, distinct bodies). The missing piece of due diligence: how much a company sells to the government. Company records only. Free sample, no payment: https://api.brazilayer.com/v1/licitacoes/amostra

GET
https://api.brazilayer.com/v1/licitacoes/fornecedor/:cnpj
Price
$0.01
per call in USDC
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
319 ms
676 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
4 h ago, next any minute now

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

GET https://api.brazilayer.com/v1/licitacoes/fornecedor/:cnpj

Each call costs $0.01 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://api.brazilayer.com/v1/licitacoes/fornecedor/:cnpj

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

{
  "cnpj": "75494187000126",
  "contratos": [
    {
      "data_assinatura": "2026-07-20",
      "objeto": "Serviços contínuos de transporte",
      "orgao_nome": "MUNICIPIO DE ITAJAI",
      "uf": "SC",
      "valor_global": 138000
    }
  ],
  "resumo": {
    "orgaos_distintos": 4,
    "total_contratos": 12,
    "valor_total": 1850000
  }
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.01.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://api.brazilayer.com/v1/licitacoes/fornecedor/:cnpj'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://api.brazilayer.com/v1/licitacoes/fornecedor/:cnpj' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.01 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.01" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.01 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.brazilayer.com%2Fv1%2Flicitacoes%2Ffornecedor%2F%3Acnpj
const res = await pay("https://api.brazilayer.com/v1/licitacoes/fornecedor/:cnpj");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.01 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.01"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://api.brazilayer.com/v1/licitacoes/fornecedor/:cnpj")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
4 h agoPassed4021.1 s$0.01
8 h agoPassed402455 ms$0.01
12 h agoPassed402149 ms$0.01
16 h agoPassed402613 ms$0.01
21 h agoPassed40296 ms$0.01
Show 10 older checks
25 h agoPassed40299 ms$0.01
29 h agoPassed402347 ms$0.01
33 h agoPassed402356 ms$0.01
37 h agoPassed402108 ms$0.01
41 h agoPassed402101 ms$0.01
45 h agoPassed402114 ms$0.01
2 days agoPassed402319 ms$0.01
2 days agoPassed402569 ms$0.01
2 days agoPassed402116 ms$0.01
3 days agoPassed402557 ms$0.01