Lp Strategy
by sol-lp-strategy in Onchain & crypto
Best Solana liquidity-pool strategy for a token mint: finds the live LP pools holding the mint from keyless DefiLlama yields (Orca, Raydium, Kamino and other Solana venues), ranks them by TVL + fee-APY + 24h volume, and suggests a concentrated-liquidity price range from the pool's return volatility. Returns the best pool, alternatives, 24h fees and the suggested range.
https://api.agentstools.dev/sol/lp/strategy- Price
- $0.03
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 26 ms
- 96 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 1 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
How to call it
GET https://api.agentstools.dev/sol/lp/strategy
Each call costs $0.03 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://api.agentstools.dev/sol/lp/strategy?mint=9BB6NFEcjBCtnNLFko2FqVQBq8HHM13kCyYcdQbgpumpParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
launchpad | string | No | Launchpad whose bonding-curve layout to decode (default pumpfun; new launchpads are added as data). One of: pumpfun. |
mint | string | Yes | Base58 Solana SPL token mint address (e.g. a pump.fun mint ending in 'pump'). The only required input; all upstream hosts are fixed server-side. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"attribution": "Pool yields by DefiLlama (yields.llama.fi)",
"available": true,
"best_pool": {
"apy_base_fees": 6.47,
"fee_pct": 0.0025,
"fees_24h_usd": 1107.6,
"pool_meta": "Standard - 0.25%",
"project": "raydium-amm",
"symbol": "WSOL-FARTCOIN",
"tvl_usd": 6251386
},
"mint": "9BB6...pump",
"ranking": "fusion of TVL + fee-APY (apyBase) + 24h volume",
"strategy": {
"suggested_range_pct": 20
}
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.03.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://api.agentstools.dev/sol/lp/strategy?mint=9BB6NFEcjBCtnNLFko2FqVQBq8HHM13kCyYcdQbgpump'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://api.agentstools.dev/sol/lp/strategy?mint=9BB6NFEcjBCtnNLFko2FqVQBq8HHM13kCyYcdQbgpump' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.03 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.03" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.03 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fapi.agentstools.dev%2Fsol%2Flp%2Fstrategy
const res = await pay("https://api.agentstools.dev/sol/lp/strategy?mint=9BB6NFEcjBCtnNLFko2FqVQBq8HHM13kCyYcdQbgpump");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.03 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.03"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://api.agentstools.dev/sol/lp/strategy?mint=9BB6NFEcjBCtnNLFko2FqVQBq8HHM13kCyYcdQbgpump")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 h ago | Passed | 402 | 26 ms | $0.03 |
| 6 h ago | Passed | 402 | 23 ms | $0.03 |
| 10 h ago | Passed | 402 | 95 ms | $0.03 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 23 ms | $0.03 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 25 ms | $0.03 |
Show 10 older checks
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 96 ms | $0.03 |
| 27 h ago | Passed | 402 | 176 ms | $0.03 |
| 31 h ago | Passed | 402 | 76 ms | $0.03 |
| 35 h ago | Passed | 402 | 75 ms | $0.03 |
| 39 h ago | Passed | 402 | 22 ms | $0.03 |
| 42 h ago | Passed | 402 | 86 ms | $0.03 |
| 46 h ago | Passed | 402 | 87 ms | $0.03 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 28 ms | $0.03 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 22 ms | $0.03 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 26 ms | $0.03 |