Market Llm Visibility
by MarketPulse in AI models & inference
Does ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Google AI Overviews even know this brand exists? Assesses current AI-answer visibility, scores the specific factors driving LLM citation, and returns quick wins plus a six-week plan to improve it, for a given brand and/or topic. Worldwide. For marketing and answer-engine-optimization agents.
https://marketpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/market/llm-visibility- Price
- $0.15
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 0.0%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- -
- no timed checks yet
- Last check
- Failed
- 3 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Latest check failed 3 h ago: Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://marketpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/market/llm-visibility
Each call costs $0.15 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://marketpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/market/llm-visibility?brand=Acme+Plumbing&lang=en&topic=emergency+plumber+Manchester+UKParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
brand | string | No | The brand to assess AI-answer visibility for — provide brand and/or topic |
lang | string | No | Language to respond in — defaults to English |
topic | string | No | The topic or category to assess AI visibility within — provide brand and/or topic |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 50 lines
{
"amazon_search": "The Art of SEO by Eric Enge",
"competitor_gap": "Top local competitors publish pricing ranges directly on their sites, which AI systems favor when answering cost questions",
"content_types_ai_favors": [
"Direct-answer FAQs",
"Step-by-step how-to content",
"Pricing transparency pages"
],
"disclaimer": "AI citation patterns change frequently. Re-assess monthly as LLM training and retrieval methods evolve.",
"eat_signals": {
"authoritativeness": "Earn citations from local news or trade directories",
"expertise": "Add technician credentials and years-in-business",
"trustworthiness": "Display licensing info and verified reviews prominently"
},
"llm_citation_factors": [
{
"factor": "Structured FAQ content answering direct customer questions",
"score": "low",
"what_to_do": "Publish a dedicated FAQ page with question-form headings"
}
],
"quick_wins": [
{
"action": "Add an FAQPage schema block to the service page",
"effort": "low",
"how_to": "Mark up the 5 most common customer questions with FAQPage schema",
"impact": "medium"
}
],
"schema_markup": {
"priority_pages": "Homepage and primary service pages",
"recommended_types": [
"FAQPage",
"LocalBusiness"
],
"why": "Structured data helps AI systems extract and attribute answers"
},
"six_week_plan": [
{
"action": "Publish FAQ page with schema markup",
"week": "1-2"
},
{
"action": "Add pricing transparency page",
"week": "3-4"
}
],
"visibility_assessment": "Low — no evidence this brand is currently surfaced in AI-generated answers for its core service category",
"why_it_matters": "AI Overviews and chat assistants increasingly answer local-service queries before a user ever clicks a search result"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.15.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://marketpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/market/llm-visibility?brand=Acme+Plumbing&lang=en&topic=emergency+plumber+Manchester+UK'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://marketpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/market/llm-visibility?brand=Acme+Plumbing&lang=en&topic=emergency+plumber+Manchester+UK' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.15 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.15" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.15 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmarketpulse.theaslangroupllc.com%2Fapi%2Fmarket%2Fllm-visibility
const res = await pay("https://marketpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/market/llm-visibility?brand=Acme+Plumbing&lang=en&topic=emergency+plumber+Manchester+UK");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.15 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.15"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://marketpulse.theaslangroupllc.com/api/market/llm-visibility?brand=Acme+Plumbing&lang=en&topic=emergency+plumber+Manchester+UK")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 h ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 239 ms | $0.15 |
| 9 h ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 207 ms | $0.15 |
| 15 h ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 199 ms | $0.15 |
| 20 h ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 219 ms | $0.15 |
| 26 h ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 244 ms | $0.15 |
Show 7 older checks
| 32 h ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 247 ms | $0.15 |
| 37 h ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 198 ms | $0.15 |
| 42 h ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 169 ms | $0.15 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 208 ms | $0.15 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 157 ms | $0.15 |
| 2 days ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 534 ms | $0.15 |
| 3 days ago | Amount "0.15" is not in atomic token units | 402 | 261 ms | $0.15 |