Micro Source Coverage Drift
by Source coverage drift in Other
Compare source coverage on exactly the same declared record cohort across two snapshots. Report per-record gained/lost sources, per-source count changes, and global coverage drift. Reject unknown sources or missing/duplicate records. Coverage does not establish source quality.
POST https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/micro/source-coverage-drift
Last 30 days
Status and outage history · Atom feed
- Uptime
- 100%
- Response time
- 378 ms typical, 636 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- 3 h ago
- Next check
- any minute now
How to call it
POST https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/micro/source-coverage-drift
Each call costs $0.0445 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/micro/source-coverage-drift
content-type: application/json
{
"after": {
"records": [
{
"recordId": "r1",
"sourceIds": [
"s2"
]
}
],
"snapshotId": "v2"
},
"before": {
"records": [
{
"recordId": "r1",
"sourceIds": [
"s1"
]
}
],
"snapshotId": "v1"
},
"dataClass": "synthetic",
"recordIds": [
"r1"
],
"sourceIds": [
"s1",
"s2"
]
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
after | object | Yes | |
before | object | Yes | |
dataClass | string | Yes | One of: public, synthetic. |
recordIds | array | Yes | |
sourceIds | array | Yes |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 48 lines
{
"amountBaseUnits": "44500",
"boundaries": [
"Public or synthetic inputs only. Caller labels are declarations,…"
],
"inputDigest": "sha256:78b1d600b12cfec6255760f8fc04a226f1c19eaedbf820efc0e49f156…",
"offerId": "source-coverage-drift",
"receiptDigest": "sha256:e125b4e4e29419609dd279251eed668c3ed2b80dc87d7b24bb49a40b5…",
"result": {
"afterCoverageBps": 5000,
"beforeCoverageBps": 5000,
"changedRecordCount": 1,
"coverageDeltaBps": 0,
"dataClass": "synthetic",
"gainedSourceIds": [
"s2"
],
"inputSha256": "sha256:78b1d600b12cfec6255760f8fc04a226f1c19eaedbf820efc0e49f156…",
"limits": [
"Public/synthetic is a caller declaration, not content inspection…"
],
"lostSourceIds": [
"s1"
],
"records": [
{
"gainedSourceIds": [
"s2"
],
"lostSourceIds": [
"s1"
],
"recordId": "r1"
}
],
"resultSha256": "sha256:52cfb1e5f2a952a9891af58ef2311d43d04b4984443939ea14ef173dd…",
"sources": [
{
"afterRecordCount": 0,
"beforeRecordCount": 1,
"delta": -1,
"sourceId": "s1"
}
],
"sourcesVerified": false
},
"version": "maha-microproducts/0.1"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.0445.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/micro/source-coverage-drift' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"after":{"records":[{"recordId":"r1","sourceIds":["s2"]}],"snapshotId":"v2"},"before":{"records":[{"recordId":"r1","sourceIds":["s1"]}],"snapshotId":"v1"},"dataClass":"synthetic","recordIds":["r1"],"sourceIds":["s1","s2"]}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/micro/source-coverage-drift' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"after":{"records":[{"recordId":"r1","sourceIds":["s2"]}],"snapshotId":"v2"},"before":{"records":[{"recordId":"r1","sourceIds":["s1"]}],"snapshotId":"v1"},"dataClass":"synthetic","recordIds":["r1"],"sourceIds":["s1","s2"]}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.0445 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.0445" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.0445 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mahastrategies.com%2Fapi%2Fv1%2Fmicro%2Fsource-coverage-drift&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/micro/source-coverage-drift", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"after": {
"records": [
{
"recordId": "r1",
"sourceIds": [
"s2"
]
}
],
"snapshotId": "v2"
},
"before": {
"records": [
{
"recordId": "r1",
"sourceIds": [
"s1"
]
}
],
"snapshotId": "v1"
},
"dataClass": "synthetic",
"recordIds": [
"r1"
],
"sourceIds": [
"s1",
"s2"
]
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.0445 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.0445"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://www.mahastrategies.com/api/v1/micro/source-coverage-drift",
json={
"after": {
"records": [
{
"recordId": "r1",
"sourceIds": [
"s2",
],
},
],
"snapshotId": "v2",
},
"before": {
"records": [
{
"recordId": "r1",
"sourceIds": [
"s1",
],
},
],
"snapshotId": "v1",
},
"dataClass": "synthetic",
"recordIds": [
"r1",
],
"sourceIds": [
"s1",
"s2",
],
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
- No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 h ago | Passed | 402 | 471 ms | $0.044 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 398 ms | $0.044 |
| 10 h ago | Passed | 402 | 535 ms | $0.044 |
| 14 h ago | Passed | 402 | 293 ms | $0.044 |
| 18 h ago | Passed | 402 | 234 ms | $0.044 |
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 519 ms | $0.044 |
| 26 h ago | Passed | 402 | 317 ms | $0.044 |
| 30 h ago | Passed | 402 | 310 ms | $0.044 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 339 ms | $0.044 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 636 ms | $0.044 |
| 40 h ago | Passed | 402 | 385 ms | $0.044 |
| 44 h ago | Passed | 402 | 336 ms | $0.044 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 419 ms | $0.044 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 519 ms | $0.044 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 613 ms | $0.044 |