Ot Campaign
by ot-intel-api.onrender.com in Other
Active ICS campaign tracker. Pass ?sector=electric&status=active. Returns campaigns currently targeting a sector with actor attribution, start date, targeted geography, TTPs in use, and CVEs being exploited. No free equivalent for live campaign status.
https://ot-intel-api.onrender.com/ot/campaign- Price
- $0.05
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 597 ms
- 711 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 2 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://ot-intel-api.onrender.com/ot/campaign
Each call costs $0.05 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://ot-intel-api.onrender.com/ot/campaign?sector=electric&status=activeParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
sector | string | Yes | Industrial sector e.g. energy, water, electric, manufacturing, oil-and-gas, nuclear, chemical |
status | string | No | active (default) | all |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 33 lines
{
"campaign_count": 2,
"campaigns": [
{
"actor": "VOLTZITE",
"confidence": "high",
"exploited_cves": [
"CVE-2023-38380"
],
"name": "VOLTZITE Pre-Positioning Campaign",
"start_date": "2023-Q1",
"status": "active",
"targeted_geography": [
"United States",
"Pacific Islands"
],
"ttps_in_use": [
"T0859",
"T0812",
"T0885"
]
}
],
"data_sources": [
"MITRE-ATT&CK-ICS",
"CISA-ICS-CERT",
"OT-Intel-DB",
"DeepSeek-CTI-Analysis"
],
"freshness": "2026-06-13T10:00:00Z",
"sector": "electric",
"status": "active"
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.05.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://ot-intel-api.onrender.com/ot/campaign?sector=electric&status=active'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://ot-intel-api.onrender.com/ot/campaign?sector=electric&status=active' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.05 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.05" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.05 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fot-intel-api.onrender.com%2Fot%2Fcampaign
const res = await pay("https://ot-intel-api.onrender.com/ot/campaign?sector=electric&status=active");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.05 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.05"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://ot-intel-api.onrender.com/ot/campaign?sector=electric&status=active")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 h ago | Passed | 402 | 755 ms | $0.05 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 702 ms | $0.05 |
| 12 h ago | Passed | 402 | 606 ms | $0.05 |
| 17 h ago | Passed | 402 | 259 ms | $0.05 |
| 22 h ago | Passed | 402 | 238 ms | $0.05 |
Show 10 older checks
| 27 h ago | Passed | 402 | 551 ms | $0.05 |
| 31 h ago | Passed | 402 | 205 ms | $0.05 |
| 36 h ago | Passed | 402 | 632 ms | $0.05 |
| 41 h ago | Passed | 402 | 301 ms | $0.05 |
| 45 h ago | Passed | 402 | 598 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 706 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 255 ms | $0.05 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 264 ms | $0.05 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 707 ms | $0.05 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 255 ms | $0.05 |