Pan Scaling
by Cooking Calculators in Other
Baking pan volume in cups and mL for round, square and rectangular pans, and the recipe scale factor from one pan to another.
https://cooking-calc.x402tookit.com/pan-scaling- Price
- $0.02
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 56.3%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 525 ms
- 770 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Failed
- 23 h ago, next in 1 h
Reliability
Latest check failed 23 h ago: Expected HTTP 402, got 530
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
GET https://cooking-calc.x402tookit.com/pan-scaling
Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
GET https://cooking-calc.x402tookit.com/pan-scaling?from=round%3A9x2&to=rect%3A9x13x2&unit=inParameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
from | string | Yes | Pan the recipe was written for, like round:9x2 (diameter x height), square:8x2 or rect:9x13x2 |
to | string | Yes | Pan you will use, same format |
unit | string | No | in (default) or cm for the dimensions |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
Example response, 37 lines
{
"areaScaleFactor": 1.83912,
"asOf": "2026-10-11T14:26:09.526Z",
"degraded": false,
"disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
"notChecked": [
"real pan capacity: the geometry here uses the inside dimensions to the rim, and published pan capacities run 10 to 15% lower (rounded corners, sloped sides, and the batter fills only half to two-third…",
"baking time, which depends on batter depth: a recipe in a shallower pan bakes faster",
"…2 more"
],
"panFrom": {
"areaSquareInches": 63.617,
"heightInches": 2,
"shape": "round",
"volumeCubicInches": 127.23,
"volumeCups": 8.813,
"volumeMl": 2085
},
"panTo": {
"areaSquareInches": 117,
"heightInches": 2,
"shape": "rect",
"volumeCubicInches": 234,
"volumeCups": 16.21,
"volumeMl": 3835
},
"reasons": [
"Volume = area x height; 1 US cup = 14.4375 cubic inches (236.588 mL).",
"Heights match, so volume and area scale the same.",
"…1 more"
],
"source": "computed locally",
"summary": "The new pan holds 16.21 cups against 8.813 (volume ratio 1.839); scale the recipe by about 1.84.",
"unit": "in",
"verdict": "NEED_MORE_BATTER",
"volumeScaleFactor": 1.83912
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://cooking-calc.x402tookit.com/pan-scaling?from=round%3A9x2&to=rect%3A9x13x2&unit=in'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://cooking-calc.x402tookit.com/pan-scaling?from=round%3A9x2&to=rect%3A9x13x2&unit=in' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcooking-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fpan-scaling
const res = await pay("https://cooking-calc.x402tookit.com/pan-scaling?from=round%3A9x2&to=rect%3A9x13x2&unit=in");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.get("https://cooking-calc.x402tookit.com/pan-scaling?from=round%3A9x2&to=rect%3A9x13x2&unit=in")
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 114 ms | - |
| 36 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 148 ms | - |
| 47 h ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 91 ms | - |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 517 ms | $0.02 |
| 3 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 105 ms | - |
Show 10 older checks
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 545 ms | $0.02 |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 94 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 2.0 s | - |
| 5 days ago | Expected HTTP 402, got 530 | 530 | 214 ms | - |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 526 ms | $0.02 |
| 5 days ago | Passed | 402 | 525 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 538 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 502 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 770 ms | $0.02 |
| 6 days ago | Passed | 402 | 185 ms | $0.02 |