61trust / 100

Pixel Density

by CSS Design Calc in Other

x402 APIPassing, checked 4 h ago

Screen pixel density (PPI) from resolution and diagonal, physical size, CSS viewport at a device pixel ratio, and image widths.

GET
https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/pixel-density
Price
$0.02
per call in USDC
Uptime
64.3%
last 30 days
Response time
518 ms
932 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
4 h ago, next in 2 h

Run a free test callHow to call it

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings

How to call it

GET https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/pixel-density

Each call costs $0.02 in USDC on Polygon, paid with the request over x402.

Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.

Example request

From the listing.

GET https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/pixel-density?cssWidth=400&diagonalIn=27&dpr=1&heightPx=1440&widthPx=2560

Parameters

ParameterTypeRequiredDescription
cssWidthnumberNoA CSS width in px to compute image pixel widths for (default 100)
diagonalInnumberYesScreen diagonal in inches
dprnumberNoDevice pixel ratio the browser reports (default 1)
heightPxnumberYesVertical resolution in physical pixels
widthPxnumberYesHorizontal resolution in physical pixels

Example response

The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.

Example response, 38 lines
{
  "asOf": "2026-10-11T14:32:44.713Z",
  "cssPixelPhysicalMm": 0.233487,
  "cssViewportHeight": 1440,
  "cssViewportWidth": 2560,
  "degraded": false,
  "disclaimer": "Screening signal computed from the named public source. Not financial, legal or investment advice; provided as is. Verify at the source before acting.",
  "dotPitchMm": 0.23349,
  "dpr": 1,
  "heightInches": 13.2371,
  "heightMm": 336.221,
  "idealDprForReferencePixel": 1.1332,
  "imageWidthsForCssWidth": {
    "1.5x": 600,
    "1x": 400,
    "2x": 800,
    "3x": 1200,
    "atThisDpr": 400,
    "cssWidth": 400
  },
  "megapixels": 3.6864,
  "notChecked": [
    "the real device pixel ratio (browsers and OS scaling set it, not the panel)",
    "non-square pixels and pentile subpixel layouts",
    "…2 more"
  ],
  "ppi": 108.7855,
  "ppiClass": "STANDARD",
  "reasons": [
    "One CSS pixel spans 0.00919 in (0.2335 mm) on this screen at DPR 1; the CSS reference pixel is 1/96 in.",
    "Bands: under 120 PPI standard, 120 to 220 high, above 220 very high."
  ],
  "source": "PPI = sqrt(w^2 + h^2) / diagonal; CSS reference pixel = 1/96 in; computed locally",
  "summary": "2560 x 1440 on a 27 inch screen is 108.79 PPI (23.53 x 13.24 in); 2560 x 1440 CSS px at DPR 1.",
  "verdict": "STANDARD",
  "widthInches": 23.5325,
  "widthMm": 597.727
}

Call it from code

The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.02.

curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i 'https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/pixel-density?cssWidth=400&diagonalIn=27&dpr=1&heightPx=1440&widthPx=2560'

# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - 'https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/pixel-density?cssWidth=400&diagonalIn=27&dpr=1&heightPx=1440&widthPx=2560' \
  | grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decode
JavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

// Pays at most $0.02 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.02" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.02 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcss-design-calc.x402tookit.com%2Fpixel-density
const res = await pay("https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/pixel-density?cssWidth=400&diagonalIn=27&dpr=1&heightPx=1440&widthPx=2560");
console.log(res.status, await res.text());
Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client

# Pays at most $0.02 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.02"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))

with x402_requests(client) as session:
    res = session.get("https://css-design-calc.x402tookit.com/pixel-density?cssWidth=400&diagonalIn=27&dpr=1&heightPx=1440&widthPx=2560")
    print(res.status_code, res.text)

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTimePrice
4 h agoPassed402518 ms$0.02
17 h agoPassed402572 ms$0.02
2 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530257 ms-
3 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530100 ms-
4 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530139 ms-
Show 9 older checks
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530181 ms-
5 days agoExpected HTTP 402, got 530530159 ms-
5 days agoPassed402513 ms$0.02
5 days agoPassed402519 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402506 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402556 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402932 ms$0.02
6 days agoPassed402478 ms$0.02
7 days agoPassed402431 ms$0.02