83trust / 100

Praxikon

by praxikon.com in Other

MCP serverPassing, checked 41 min ago

EU AI Act and GDPR checks with sources: classify an AI system, trace each duty, find the supervisor.

https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp
Tools
9
open to any client
Uptime
100%
last 30 days
Response time
198 ms
230 ms slowest 5%
Last check
Passed
41 min ago, next in 6 h

Scan it nowHow to connect

Reliability

All checks passedSome failedAll failedNot checked

Status and outage history · Atom feed

How to connect

Add it to any MCP client that supports remote servers.

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "praxikon": {
      "type": "http",
      "url": "https://www.praxikon.com/api/mcp"
    }
  }
}

9 tools

  • classify_system

    Use this as the first step when you hold a concrete AI system and need to know which routes of the EU AI Act come into view: prohibited practice screening, Annex III high risk, transparency, FRIA and the general purpose model route, and with a version 2 profile the wider set of…

  • get_applicable_obligations

    Use this when you need the obligations themselves for one assessed system rather than the classification picture: which obligations apply, which possibly apply, from when, why, and on which source and locator. Returns one entry per assessed obligation, filtered by applicability…

  • explain_applicability

    Use this whenever you have to justify why an obligation does or does not bear on a case, and an outcome on its own is not enough. It returns the legal path: the conditions under which the rule is about a situation, the exceptions under which it is not despite those conditions…

  • get_source_provenance

    Use this before you quote, cite or hand on anything from this graph, and whenever a reader asks on what authority a statement rests. It returns, for one object, every statement with its kind, its primary source, the locator inside that source and the review metadata, plus the…

  • get_national_enforcement

    Use this for the national layer: which authority is designated in a member state, how far the implementing law has come, and which dated enforcement signals are recorded, each with a primary source. The authority is recorded as free text per member state and is deliberately not…

  • check_case

    Use this when the user describes a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data (a system, a project, a supplier) and wants to know whether a DPIA, a FRIA or duties under the GDPR (AVG) and the EU AI Act come into play. It runs the Praxikon case check: fixed rules over fixed…

  • export_dpia_intake

    Use this when the user wants the DPIA intake of a concrete, intended use of AI or of personal data as a Word file to work on, and, where the FRIA comes into play, the FRIA draft too. It takes the same fixed fact answers as the case check of Praxikon, as coded choices, and gives…

  • answer_question

    Use this for a short, general question about the EU AI Act or the GDPR (AVG), such as whether a customer service chatbot has to say that it is AI or when a DPIA is required. It looks the question up in the published Praxikon answers: deterministic, no language model, and with…

  • request_expert_review

    Use this only when the user asks for it in their own words: they want to talk to a person, ask for a human expert, or ask how to get in touch about their situation. Never call it on your own initiative, never as a closing suggestion, and never because an answer seems uncertain…

Security scan

No findings

We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks

WhenResultHTTPTime
41 min agoPassed200133 ms
10 h agoPassed200202 ms
20 h agoPassed200166 ms
30 h agoPassed200198 ms
39 h agoPassed200230 ms
Show 5 older checks
2 days agoPassed200176 ms
2 days agoPassed200227 ms
3 days agoPassed200198 ms
3 days agoPassed200198 ms
4 days agoPassed200395 ms