Premium Portfolio Analysis
by True Value Rankings in Onchain & crypto
Fundamentals profile of a cryptocurrency allocation from True Value Rankings: the allocation-weighted scores for the 8 fundamental metrics, each holding's TVR Score and valuation category, and the portfolio TVR Score computed by TVR's scoring engine (the same calculation as the site's what-if simulator). Scores only; no prices. $0.08 USDC per call. Educational model output, not a recommendation.
https://truevaluerankings.com/premium/portfolio-analysis- Price
- $0.08
- per call in USDC
- Uptime
- 100%
- last 30 days
- Response time
- 424 ms
- 707 ms slowest 5%
- Last check
- Passed
- 3 h ago, next any minute now
Reliability
Status and outage history · Atom feed · Watch with other listings
How to call it
POST https://truevaluerankings.com/premium/portfolio-analysis
Each call costs $0.08 in USDC on Base, paid with the request over x402.
Run a free test callOne unpaid request, the way an agent sends it. You see the payment challenge it gets back. Nothing is charged.
Example request
From the listing.
POST https://truevaluerankings.com/premium/portfolio-analysis
content-type: application/json
{
"portfolio": [
{
"allocation": 60,
"coin": "BTC"
},
{
"allocation": 25,
"coin": "ETH"
},
{
"allocation": 15,
"coin": "XMR"
}
]
}Parameters
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
portfolio | array of object | Yes | Holdings: each a covered coin (ticker or name) and an allocation above 0. Allocations are normalised to 100%. |
Example response
The provider's example. We can't check it without paying.
{
"blended_metrics": {
"adoption": 86.3,
"economic_model": 71.4,
"legal_clarity": 75.4,
"liquidity": 87.6,
"longevity": 86.2,
"network_security": 74.9,
"privacy": 30.5,
"technical_dev": 82.6
},
"holdings": [
{
"allocation_pct": 60,
"name": "Bitcoin",
"symbol": "BTC",
"tvr_score": 80,
"valuation": "undervalued"
}
],
"portfolio_tvr_score": 74.6,
"product": "portfolio_analysis",
"success": true
}Call it from code
The curl command shows the payment challenge. The JavaScript and Python versions pay and call, and never pay more than $0.08.
curl: see the payment challenge
# bash or zsh: see the payment challenge. Nothing is charged.
curl -sS -g -i -X POST 'https://truevaluerankings.com/premium/portfolio-analysis' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"portfolio":[{"allocation":60,"coin":"BTC"},{"allocation":25,"coin":"ETH"},{"allocation":15,"coin":"XMR"}]}'
# x402 v2 sends the challenge base64-encoded in the PAYMENT-REQUIRED header (v1 sends it in the body).
# To read the header:
curl -sS -g -o /dev/null -D - -X POST 'https://truevaluerankings.com/premium/portfolio-analysis' \
-H 'content-type: application/json' \
--data-raw '{"portfolio":[{"allocation":60,"coin":"BTC"},{"allocation":25,"coin":"ETH"},{"allocation":15,"coin":"XMR"}]}' \
| grep -i '^payment-required:' | cut -d' ' -f2 | tr -d '\r' | base64 --decodeJavaScript: pay and call
// npm i @x402/fetch @x402/evm viem
import { wrapFetchWithPayment, x402Client } from "@x402/fetch";
import { registerExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";
// Pays at most $0.08 per call.
const client = new x402Client().setSpendControls({ maxAmountPerPayment: "$0.08" });
registerExactEvmScheme(client, { signer: privateKeyToAccount(process.env.EVM_PRIVATE_KEY) });
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);
// Not sure it's safe to pay? ToolVet checks it first for $0.005. Pay for that from a separate
// client: this one is capped at $0.08 per payment. GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftruevaluerankings.com%2Fpremium%2Fportfolio-analysis&method=POST
const res = await pay("https://truevaluerankings.com/premium/portfolio-analysis", {
method: "POST",
headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
body: JSON.stringify({
"portfolio": [
{
"allocation": 60,
"coin": "BTC"
},
{
"allocation": 25,
"coin": "ETH"
},
{
"allocation": 15,
"coin": "XMR"
}
]
}),
});
console.log(res.status, await res.text());Python: pay and call
# pip install "x402[requests,evm]"
import os
from eth_account import Account
from x402 import x402ClientSync
from x402.http.clients import x402_requests
from x402.mechanisms.evm import EthAccountSigner
from x402.mechanisms.evm.exact.register import register_exact_evm_client
# Pays at most $0.08 per call.
client = x402ClientSync().set_spend_controls({"max_amount_per_payment": "$0.08"})
register_exact_evm_client(client, EthAccountSigner(Account.from_key(os.environ["EVM_PRIVATE_KEY"])))
with x402_requests(client) as session:
res = session.post(
"https://truevaluerankings.com/premium/portfolio-analysis",
json={
"portfolio": [
{
"allocation": 60,
"coin": "BTC",
},
{
"allocation": 25,
"coin": "ETH",
},
{
"allocation": 15,
"coin": "XMR",
},
],
},
)
print(res.status_code, res.text)Security scan
No findings
We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.
Recent checks
| When | Result | HTTP | Time | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 h ago | Passed | 402 | 511 ms | $0.08 |
| 7 h ago | Passed | 402 | 466 ms | $0.08 |
| 12 h ago | Passed | 402 | 733 ms | $0.08 |
| 16 h ago | Passed | 402 | 349 ms | $0.08 |
| 20 h ago | Passed | 402 | 368 ms | $0.08 |
Show 10 older checks
| 24 h ago | Passed | 402 | 348 ms | $0.08 |
| 29 h ago | Passed | 402 | 405 ms | $0.08 |
| 33 h ago | Passed | 402 | 392 ms | $0.08 |
| 37 h ago | Passed | 402 | 468 ms | $0.08 |
| 41 h ago | Passed | 402 | 399 ms | $0.08 |
| 46 h ago | Passed | 402 | 444 ms | $0.08 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 434 ms | $0.08 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 508 ms | $0.08 |
| 2 days ago | Passed | 402 | 447 ms | $0.08 |
| 3 days ago | Passed | 402 | 389 ms | $0.08 |