Project Plan Execute

Last 30 days

Uptime

100%

Response time

682 ms typical, 1.1 s slowest 5%

Last check

3 h ago

Next check

any minute now

How to call it

# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X POST "https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/project_plan/execute" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Create milestones, dependencies, work packages, roles, and acceptance checks from supplied requirements. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}'

import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Fproject_plan%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/project_plan/execute", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Create milestones, dependencies, work packages, roles, and acceptance checks from supplied requirements. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}),
});
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "audience": "Business operations manager",
  "brief": "Create milestones, dependencies, work packages, roles, and acceptance checks from supplied requirements. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
  "source_text": "Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."
}

Example output

{
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n# Project Plan Draft: Scheduling Improvement for Example Door Company\n\n## Milestones\n1. **Project Kickoff and Requirement Confirmation** (Week 1)\n2. **Process Assessment Completion** (Week 2)\n3. **Staff Workshop Completion** (Week 3) *[If Vendor B selected]*\n4. **Implementation Planning and Scope Definition** (Week 4)\n5. **Implementation of Scheduling Improvements** (Weeks 5-6)\n6. **Project Closure and Review** (End of Week 6)\n\n## Dependencies\n- Selection of vendor (Vendor A or Vendor B) depends",
  "assumptions": [
    "Vendor proposals are final and no further negotiation is required.",
    "Staff are available for weekday consultations and workshops."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    "Current booking volume data is missing.",
    "Customer feedback on scheduling is unavailable."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "external_research_performed": false,
    "generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:41:56.405Z",
    "source": "buyer_supplied"
  },
  "request_id": "example_project_plan",
  "requires_human_review": true,
  "summary": "A six-week project plan draft for improving scheduling at Example Door Company is created based on the supplied fictional brief. It includes milestones, dependencies, work packages, roles, and accepta",
  "task": "project_plan"
}

Security scan

• No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks