Project Retrospective Execute

Last 30 days

Uptime

100%

Response time

721 ms typical, 1.1 s slowest 5%

Last check

3 h ago

Next check

any minute now

How to call it

# See the payment challenge (nothing is charged)
curl -i -X POST "https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/project_retrospective/execute" \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -d '{"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Turn supplied retrospective notes into themes, evidence, lessons, and specific improvement actions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}'

import { wrapFetchWithPayment } from "@x402/fetch";
import { x402Client } from "@x402/core/client";
import { ExactEvmScheme } from "@x402/evm/exact/client";
import { privateKeyToAccount } from "viem/accounts";

const client = new x402Client().register(
  "eip155:8453",
  new ExactEvmScheme(privateKeyToAccount(process.env.AGENT_KEY)),
);
const pay = wrapFetchWithPayment(fetch, client);

// Not sure it's safe to pay? Preflight it first for $0.005:
// GET https://toolvet.app/api/v1/check?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tradepilotusa.com%2Fapi%2Fagent-commerce%2Fv1%2Fservices%2Fproject_retrospective%2Fexecute
const res = await pay("https://www.tradepilotusa.com/api/agent-commerce/v1/services/project_retrospective/execute", {
  method: "POST",
  headers: { "content-type": "application/json" },
  body: JSON.stringify({"audience":"Business operations manager","brief":"Turn supplied retrospective notes into themes, evidence, lessons, and specific improvement actions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.","source_text":"Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."}),
});
console.log(await res.json());

Example input

{
  "audience": "Business operations manager",
  "brief": "Turn supplied retrospective notes into themes, evidence, lessons, and specific improvement actions. Use only the supplied fictional example material and clearly identify missing evidence.",
  "source_text": "Fictional supplied business brief: Example Door Company installs residential entry doors in Dallas with a two-person crew and weekday consultations. The project is to improve scheduling over six weeks. Vendor A proposes a process assessment for $500; Vendor B proposes an assessment and staff workshop for $800. Both prices are fictional examples, not researched market prices. Evaluation criteria are implementation effort, scope clarity and staff training. Current booking volume, customer feedback, vendor references and measured outcomes are unknown."
}

Example output

{
  "artifact": "Illustrative excerpt from a synthetic provider check:\n# Retrospective Analysis: Scheduling Improvement Project for Example Door Company\n\n## Themes\n\n1. **Project Scope and Vendor Proposals**\n   - Two vendors proposed different approaches: Vendor A with a process assessment only, Vendor B with assessment plus staff workshop.\n   - Pricing is fictional but indicates a cost difference ($500 vs $800).\n\n2. **Evaluation Criteria**\n   - Implementation effort\n   - Scope clarity\n   - Staff training\n\n3. **Information Gaps**\n   - Lack of current booking volume ",
  "assumptions": [
    "The fictional pricing provided is not representative of actual market rates.",
    "The project duration is six weeks as stated."
  ],
  "evidence_gaps": [
    "Current booking volume data for scheduling operations.",
    "Customer feedback related to scheduling experience."
  ],
  "provenance": {
    "external_research_performed": false,
    "generated_at": "2026-09-22T14:41:59.683Z",
    "source": "buyer_supplied"
  },
  "request_id": "example_project_retrospective",
  "requires_human_review": true,
  "summary": "The retrospective analysis identified key themes around vendor proposals, evaluation criteria, and significant data gaps. Lessons emphasize the need for comprehensive data collection and holistic vend",
  "task": "project_retrospective"
}

Security scan

• No findings. We scan names, descriptions and tool definitions for hidden instructions and other prompt-injection patterns.

Recent checks